To: 2ndDivisionVet
Guaranteed to head up to the Supreme Court!
2 posted on
08/21/2019 8:27:34 PM PDT by
princess leah
(Princess Leah)
To: princess leah
There is nothing that binds an elector to vote for anyone that he/she does not want to vote for. The writers of the Constitution wanted a way to override the people if they made a stupid choice. There is also nothing in the Constitution that says the people select the president. The people select electors who promise to vote for a certain candidate.
7 posted on
08/21/2019 8:37:11 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Where does it say in the Constitution anyone is entitled to the property another has labored for?)
To: princess leah
Hope it gets to the Supremes before the election.
26 posted on
08/21/2019 10:02:38 PM PDT by
Veto!
(Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me))
To: princess leah
42 posted on
08/22/2019 3:00:55 AM PDT by
Eleutheria5
(If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: princess leah
45 posted on
08/22/2019 3:52:43 AM PDT by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: princess leah
The vote was 2 to 1 in a court minority ruling. It will not stand.
To: princess leah
Going to the popular vote would then become a preferable alternative. You think members of the Senate act like primped-and-preened royalty? Just wait until you see a couple of electors out there with their votes for sale.
53 posted on
08/22/2019 5:57:27 AM PDT by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson