Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Denmark is a very special country with incredible people, but based on PM Mette Frederiksen’s...
Twitter ^ | 8/20/2019 | President Trump

Posted on 08/20/2019 5:26:15 PM PDT by MountainWalker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 last
To: MountainWalker

Trump tower and casino. I can see it now.

5.56mm


161 posted on 08/24/2019 1:46:00 PM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! BUILD THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Territory. 56000 barely makes a town, never mind a city or a state. They also like home rule.

Maybe. Or maybe they won't like territory-status home rule if the FedGov doesn't pay big subsidies like the Danish crown does. There's pros and cons to territory vs statehood.

But size doesn't matter that much, the only limit is maybe out of the Northwest Ordinance, and that is only 60M. They're almost there!
162 posted on 08/24/2019 2:35:15 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java; Chickensoup
Population. Not enough for a state. Ok for a territory.

So what is the right number for a territory to become a State?

60M per the Northwest Ordinance? 52,240? That's what Arkansas had to get statehood. Oregon had the same 52M, one year after achieving statehood. (You'd be amazed how hard it is to find statehood population data..) How about 42M? There's the number Illinois had in 1818. Why not a bare 12M? That's more than the population of Nevada when it was admitted as a state!
163 posted on 08/25/2019 8:41:48 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar; COBOL2Java; Chickensoup

Gah, forgot to finish part II of my post.

Let’s say we set an arbitrary number for statehood. 100,000 is a nice round number, and big enough out of the small numbers of population. (Hell, we can double it to 200M if y’all want!)

How long do you think it would take Greenland to hit those numbers? And then apply for statehood? If they have 56M now, with a huge amount of natural resources (including rare earths!), I’d wager there would be quite a lot of companies moving in to start mining operations, expand the fishing industry, and so on. And each of those jobs generates what, 3x? 7x? in auxiliary jobs: restaurants, hotels, construction, entertainment, etc etc etc. Even if these people don’t become full residents of Greenland, they’re still part of the residing population and will likely be counted towards statehood population.

If we actually purchase Greenland in 2020, I would guess it becomes a State by 2030 at the latest.


164 posted on 08/25/2019 9:03:20 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson