Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
From the article: "Wind and solar are basically a waste of money. The subsidies can be justified only as a payment for reducing CO2 emissions. But wind and solar are expensive devices for reducing emissions. It cost about $140 in subsidies per metric ton of CO2 emissions avoided. Using nuclear or buying carbon offsets is a much cheaper solution."

Here's an even cheaper solution; use nuclear and eliminate the nonsense of CO2 hysteria and carbon offsets.

28 posted on 08/17/2019 8:30:12 AM PDT by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DakotaGator
Here's an even cheaper solution; use nuclear and eliminate the nonsense of CO2 hysteria and carbon offsets.

Here's an even cheaper "cheaper solution":

Never mind what kind of power it is. Start telling the truth about CO2 and debunking the AGW lie....

Most rational people already don't believe it. (which leaves out RATs and other socialist control freaks)

38 posted on 08/17/2019 8:59:17 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER ( "The Owl" eats RATs for breakfast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson