This has to do with the New York Rifle and Pistol Association’s case.
They know that they don’t have an argument, and are reduced to using desperate threats.
If one is only allowed to transport their firearm from their homes and to the range, and this somehow isn’t a violation of a constitutional right...
THEN.
That would also mean that one only has free speech when travelling from their homes to a range.
Only has freedom of religion.
Only is secure from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
Only protected from cruel and unusual punishments.
One would have their civil rights safe ONLY in their homes, and while travelling to or from a gun range.
It’s an absurd argument that the tyrants know they’ll lose.
This brief was directed at Roberts. Hes a coward and it just might work.