Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: knighthawk

Lots of historical support for his position.
But protecting young girls is an advance, not an aberation.


5 posted on 08/12/2019 11:25:58 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
Lots of historical support for his position. But protecting young girls is an advance, not an aberation.

It's also protecting boys so they can have normal first relationships and not have to compete with men.

In California the age of consent is 18 which can put most high school boys in jail. In New Jersey the age of consent is 13 as long as the older person is within 4 years of age. That sounds better suited for modern times.

While no parent wants their teen daughter getting knocked up, if they are sending her to a public high school they also need to put her on the pill.

21 posted on 08/13/2019 6:23:34 AM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson