Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SanchoP
Crenshaw continued, “At its heart what we are talking about is the ability to confiscate weapons where there is evidence that violence is about to be committed. It’s that simple, and this isn’t that controversial”.

Evidence? What evidence, how is it collected in advance of a crime being committed (or not) and by whom? Who gets to determine due process? A star chamber? A DA with a reputation to make? Some gun grabbing activist judge?

All I see is a steep slippery slope with the incline properties of a cliff. And to think this guy had promise. Just another swamp critter.

11 posted on 08/11/2019 7:28:50 PM PDT by TADSLOS (You know why you can enjoy a day at the Zoo? Because walls work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TADSLOS
Crenshaw continued, “At its heart what we are talking about is the ability to confiscate weapons where there is evidence that violence is about to be committed. It’s that simple, and this isn’t that controversial”.

Once the schools start teaching the kids how to red flag their parents, it will be a nightmare. There'll be a lot of "I thought daddy was going to shoot my mom when they had an argument last night" going on.

46 posted on 08/11/2019 8:13:34 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TADSLOS

Maybe some court TOTALLY above reproach, the FISA court system would work. Starring Chief Justice....don’t blackmail me...Roberts.


89 posted on 08/11/2019 10:06:18 PM PDT by Glad2bnuts (“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson