Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA dropped salmon protection after Trump met with Alaska governor
CNN ^ | Aug. 9, 2019 | Scott Bronstein, Curt Devine, Drew Griffin and Ashley Hackett

Posted on 08/09/2019 9:30:52 PM PDT by Innovative

The Environmental Protection Agency told staff scientists that it was no longer opposing a controversial Alaska mining project that could devastate one of the world's most valuable wild salmon fisheries just one day after President Trump met with Alaska's governor, CNN has learned.

The EPA publicly announced the reversal July 30, but EPA staff sources tell CNN that they were informed of the decision a month earlier, during a hastily arranged video conference after Trump's meeting with Gov. Mike Dunleavy. The governor, a supporter of the project, emerged from that meeting saying the president assured him that he's "doing everything he can to work with us on our mining concerns."

The news came as a "total shock" to some top EPA scientists who were planning to oppose the project on environmental grounds, according to sources. Those sources asked to remain anonymous for fear of retribution.

The copper-and-gold mine planned near Bristol Bay, Alaska, known as Pebble Mine, was blocked by the Obama administration's EPA after scientists found that the mine would cause "complete loss of" the bay's fish habitat.

EPA insiders tell CNN that the timing of the agency's internal announcement suggests Trump was personally involved in the decision.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; mine; salmon; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Good.

The mine is more important.

1 posted on 08/09/2019 9:30:52 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

I think I’d rather trust some Sarah Palin response to this issue, rather than CNN


2 posted on 08/09/2019 9:32:58 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

It’s actually not but I’m sure the statement

that the mine would cause “complete loss of” the bay’s fish habitat...

is a lie.

And if it was true the fish habitat would be a serious consideration.

But the EPA has a track record of nonsensical decisions and thus I doubt it would cause “complete loss” of the fish habitat.


3 posted on 08/09/2019 9:41:41 PM PDT by dp0622 (Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

CNN has learned.

CNN will never learn.


4 posted on 08/09/2019 9:51:22 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

CNN is now ATT.


5 posted on 08/09/2019 9:52:39 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

“...a controversial Alaska mining project that COULD devastate...”

Then later...

“...WOULD devastate...”

Feh.


6 posted on 08/09/2019 10:00:25 PM PDT by jdsteel (Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

“that could” Vs. “will”

“will” wins

“that could” goes home ...wanting

“that Could” is BS lying conjecture every time it’s tried.


7 posted on 08/09/2019 10:06:51 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

The EPA is another agency that needs to be gutted.


8 posted on 08/09/2019 10:09:59 PM PDT by TonyM (Score Event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

CNN is owned by Turner Broadcasting System, a division of AT&T’s WarnerMedia.


9 posted on 08/09/2019 10:10:36 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

More winning.


10 posted on 08/09/2019 10:10:50 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

EPA. The good folks who poisoned the Animas River in Colorado and turned it “Orange Man Bad.”

https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=IVROXa-dLMK3ggfRtJCQBQ&q=epa+poisons+river&oq=epa+poiso&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0l2j0i22i30l8.1183.4746..6414...1.0..0.627.2970.2j3j1j0j1j3......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i131j0i3j0i13j0i13i30j0i13i5i30.vrTwpfH6iek


11 posted on 08/09/2019 10:21:44 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TonyM

I agree in the cutting of the EPA. I remember this, and believe it. Trump said about maybe cuts in the future

I do believe if we can win the house senate and pres, with a strong freeper leader of the house we can do a whole lot of cutting. The Dept of education, energy and many other crap agencies need to be not just cut but closed down. Please give power back to the states where it belong anyways


12 posted on 08/09/2019 10:28:54 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I remember that, what ever became of the outcome


13 posted on 08/09/2019 10:30:39 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Undecided 2012

Next time I want to be lied to I’ll accept CNN as an outlet of truth....


14 posted on 08/09/2019 10:32:24 PM PDT by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch (CNN - CIA Non-truth Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trump_vs_Evil_Witch

what’s that mean?


15 posted on 08/09/2019 10:33:44 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Undecided 2012

The EPA claimed “sovereign immunity” and only ponied up a paltry $2.9 million (despite the damage being hundreds of millions, if not billions). People should’ve gone to prison for that. If that had been a mining company that did that, you know they’d have been put out of business.


16 posted on 08/09/2019 10:43:28 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

those and others. look around what then did to mining


17 posted on 08/09/2019 10:45:21 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I wonder what it looks like today. Do they have fish returning?


18 posted on 08/09/2019 10:47:41 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Undecided 2012

“Trump said about maybe cuts in the future.”
________________________________

Even better, he’s moving parts of the EPA out to Fly Over Country.

I’ve read recent articles about EPArs crying and whining about retiring or just leaving the EPA period because they don’t want to make the move by Sept 1st.

Winning!


19 posted on 08/09/2019 10:49:21 PM PDT by Notthereyet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TonyM

The EPA is another agency that needs to be gutted.

.....................

It is being gutted. Reduced by about 1/3 so far since Trump took office.


20 posted on 08/09/2019 10:57:59 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson