[Liz]

Research Psychologist Epstein: Google Manipulation shifted some 800,000 to 4.6 million votes in 2018
GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 1/16/2019 | Jim Hoft / FR Posted by bitt

In a previous appearance on Tucker Carlson Tonight Epstein revealed that Google can take a 50-50 split among undecided voters and change it into a 90-10 split with no one knowing they had been manipulated and without leaving a paper trail… It has to do with their search suggestions.

On his latest appearance Dr. Epstein revealed that just one Google shift in search results on Election Day 2018 shifted from 800,000 to 4.6 million votes to Democratic candidates. This follows the shocking Breitbart exposé by Allum Bokhari published Thursday that proves Google has been manipulating search results. Of course the Big Tech companies have been targeting only conservative websites and publications since the 2016 election. Via Tucker Carlson Tonight: (Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...

SO HOW'D THEY DO THAT? --- hat tip Trump_the_Evil_Left
<><> Google Manipulation shifted 800,000 to 4.6 million votes in 2018.....
<><> they manipulated users w/ ads and/or search results to promote liberal/Democrat candidates/issues.
<><> they set “algorithms” to the left's get-out-the-vote activities, etc,
<><> they colluded with the left to tip users exclusively toward lib/Democrat potential voters.

========================================

What we have here....just for starters:

A) a huge unreported “contribution in-kind” to the Democrat Party,

B) social media electronic fraud.

Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414 email at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact @POTUS or @realDonaldTrump on Twitter!

US CONGRESS SWITCHBOARD: (202) 224-3121

FBI tip line web site----https://www.fbi.gov/tips
FBI electronic fraud unit----www.fbi.gov/scams-and-safety/common-fraud-schemes/internet-fraud
FBI Major Case Contact Center: 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324)

[Liz]

Sundar Pichai, Google CEO, presides over a high tech anti-America company, spewing agit-prop bent on destroying our democratic process.
He thumbed his nose at America, earlier refusing to testify over this issue before the US Congress preferring to fly back to India, his homeland..
Pichai is disloyal to the American system of justice, the American electoral system, and the US Constitution.

======================================

ACTION NOW:

<><> these tech companies should be broken up using existing anti-trust laws which are more than adequate for the task,

<><> they should be categorized as any other 1st Amendment platform, not an open forum,

<><> they should lose their Section 230 liability protections under the Communications Decency Act,

<><> all banned, suspended, shadow banned, or demonized conservatives should sue the panties off these weak-titted SJ fascists.
(hat tip nickednack)

Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414

US CONGRESS SWITCHBOARD: (202) 224-3121

U.S. Department of Justice Comment Line: 202-353-1555 Switchboard: 202-514-2000

FBI tip line web site----https://www.fbi.gov/tips
FBI electronic fraud unit----www.fbi.gov/scams-and-safety/common-fraud-schemes/internet-fraud
FBI Major Case Contact Center: 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324)

==================================

POINTS TO PONDER ---Google secretly developed a Chinese search app for Android devices
specifically designed to find and remove content China’s authoritarian government does not like.

Items Red China finds most troubling:

<><> political dissent,

<><> free speech,

<><> democracy,

<><> human rights,

<><> peaceful protest.

Just a conincdence (smirk) that Google had already designed that very same search app for Democrats.

Communist China and Democrats on the same wave-length----thanks to Google.

[Liz]

FR POSTED 12/12/2018, 6:25:53 AM by RoosterRedux
Casey Stengel would have spotted this bogus play, the so-called Google congressional hearing, from the cheap seats. "Can't anybody here play this game?" the famous baseball manager would have asked the Republicans hemming and hawing and ignoring their way through the biggest existential threat to conservatives ever.

This is too easy for the Democrats. Embarrassingly easy. They are playing the game as best they can. Republicans don't even know they are up to bat. Or how often they have already struck out. (Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

=============================

The impact of Google's conservative blacklisting can hardly be overstated because of how bad this looks for a company that has vociferously denied rigging its products against conservatives. Google is already reeling — and panicking, magnified by the disturbing quality of its first response to the leak.....

[Liz]

Exclusive: How The Word ‘Family’ Triggered A Meltdown At Google
Daily Caller ^ | January 17, 2019 | Peter Hasson / FR Posted on 1/17/2019, 10:22:50 AM by EdnaMode
A Google executive sparked a fierce backlash from employees by using the word “family” in a weekly, company-wide presentation, according to internal documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. Many Google employees became angry that the term was used while discussing a product aimed at children, because it implied that families have children, the documents show. The backlash grew large enough that a Google vice president addressed the controversy and solicited feedback on how the company could become more inclusive.

TheDCNF received the documents from a source who insisted upon anonymity in order to share them. One employee stormed out of the March 2017 presentation after a presenter “continued to show (awesome) Unicorn product features which continually use the word ‘family’ as a synonym for ‘household with children,’” he explained in an internal thread. That employee posted an extended rant, which was well-received by his colleagues, on why linking families to children is “offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong.”

He wrote: This is a diminishing and disrespectful way to speak. If you mean “children”, say “children”; we have a perfectly good word for it. “Family friendly” used as a synonym for “kid friendly” means, to me, “you and yours don’t count as a family unless you have children”. And while kids may often be less aware of it, there are kids without families too, you know. The use of “family” as a synonym for “with children” has a long-standing association with deeply homophobic organizations. This does not mean we should not use the word “family” to refer to families, but it mean we must doggedly insist that family does not imply children.

Even the sense, “suitable for the whole family”, which you might think is unobjectionable, is totally wrong too. It only works if we have advance shared conception of what “the whole family” is, and that is almost always used to mean a household with two adults, of opposite sex, in a romantic/sexual relationship, with two or more of their own children. If you mean that as a synonym for “suitable for all people” stop and notice the extraordinary unlikelihood of such a thought! So “suitable for the whole family” doesn’t mean “all people”, it means “all people in families”, which either means that all those other people aren’t in families, or something even worse. Use the word “family” to mean a loving assemblage of people who may or may not live together and may or may not include people of any particular age. STOP using it to mean “children”. It’s offensive, inappropriate, homophobic, and wrong.
Roughly 100 other Google employees upvoted the post, signaling their agreement. Other Google employees also echoed their displeasure with the term. “Thanks for writing this. So much yes,” one wrote.

“Using the word ‘family’ in this sense bothers me too,” wrote another employee, who felt excluded by the term because she was neither married nor a parent. “It smacks of the ‘family values’ agenda by the right wing, which is absolutely homophobic by its very definition,” she wrote, adding: “[I]t’s important that we fix our charged language when we become aware of how exclusionary it actually is. As a straight person in a relationship, I find the term ‘family’ offensive because it excludes me and my boyfriend, having no children of our own.”

“My family consists of me and several other trans feminine folks, some of whom I’m dating. We’re all supportive of each other and eventually aspire to live together. Just because we aren’t a heterosexual couple with 2.5 kids, a white picket fence, and a dog doesn’t mean we’re not a family,” another employee added in agreement.

Another employee wrote that “using ‘family’ to mean ‘people with kids’ is also annoying to me as a straight-cis-woman who doesn’t have or want kids. My husband, my parents, and my pets are my family.”

Google vice president Pavni Diwanji joined the conversation and acknowledged that use of the term “family” had sparked “concerns.” “Hi everyone, I realize what we said at tgif might have caused concerns in the way we talked about families. There are families without kids too, and also we needed to be more conscientious about the fact that there is a diverse makeup of parents and families,” Dwiwanji wrote.
“Please help us get to a better state. Teach us how to talk about it in inclusive way, if you feel like we are not doing it well. As a team we have very inclusive culture, and want to do right in this area. I am adding my team here so we can have open conversation,” Dwiwanji concluded.

Google did not return a request for comment on the controversy, which is yet another example of left-wing Google employees bringing their politics to work with them. TheDCNF previously reported that Google employees had internal debates about whether to suppress right-of-center media outlets, including The Daily Caller and Breitbart, in the company’s search function. That conversation, too, included a Google vice president: David Besbris.
Besbris and other participants in that conversation advocated providing contextual information about media sources in search results, and the company later did so with a short-lived fact check feature at the end of 2017.
Not only did the fact-check feature target conservative outlets almost exclusively, it was also blatantly wrong. Google’s fact check repeatedly attributed false claims to those outlets, even though they demonstrably never made those claims.
Google pulled the faulty fact-check program in January 2018, crediting TheDCNF’s investigation for the decision.

(RELATED: Google Employees Debated Burying Conservative Media In Search)

[tomkat]

Goolag surely has a/some backdoor vulnerabilities.

Be a real shame if some ‘worms’ got in and destroyed the whole seditious outfit . . .

[Liz]

ACTION PING

[neverevergiveup]

If I were advising Trump, I'd have him put a bevy of attorneys on this - looking at all the relevant laws. I'd be looking for laws that directly prohibit, and thus put at prosecutable risk, any technology company that manipulates the internet or the flow of information to influence the election. The relevant laws should be enumerated and published on the White House and Senate websites such that the public knows the rules, and those who would break those rules have been forewarned that they are being monitored and are as legal risk.

I'd advise him to right now start talking about how important it is for citizens to have safe elections in which they can feel confident that they will not be disenfranchised by those who shouldn't be voting. I would advise him to announce a team of cyber specialists, and an election ‘Cybersecurity Czar’, to ensure that no one from inside or outside our nation interferes with the vote. I would also advise him to start a confidential whistleblower ‘hotline’/reporting mechanism that would allow people to report violations and concerns.

For starters.

[Professional]

They interfered in the last election. I noticed a massive spike in anti conservative media leading into the election, it was nearly comical.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

[ProtectOurFreedom]

LOL. I scanned the headline too quickly and read that “George Will will interfere.” I think it took three readings to get it right.

[shanover]

What’s the big deal? The left really doesn’t hide anything they do nor do we do anything about it. It’s rather sickening. 2020 is not a given. Even if Trump wins re-election (it will not be a cake walk), the left can harvest more votes to strengthen the House majority and possibly take the Senate back which would lame duck Trump making MAGA again toothless.

[Inyo-Mono]

Bttt.

[SaveFerris]

[ Google Will ‘Actively Interfere’ in 2020 Elections, Researcher Says ]

I think that horse is already out of the barn...

[SaveFerris]

[Alphabet, the parent company of Google]

Heh. I suspect a few at the top have a wry sense of humor. With a bit of “in your face” attitude.

[monkeyshine]

Here is a youtube video of a Senate Hearing where Psychologist Dr. Epstein (quoted in the article) testified as to how many votes google likely swayed in past elections, and potentially how many they could influence in the future. Questioned by Senator Cruz.

https://youtu.be/IzF7nBmwPso?t=330

[eddie willers]

I misread this as "George Will ‘Actively Interfere’ in 2020 Elections'.

Same difference.

[FlingWingFlyer]

If the Russkis actually did interfere and collude in our elections as some claim, THE FRIGGIN’ DEMOCRATS MADE THEM THE BIG WINNERS. The Russkis wanted to divide America. The Friggin’, lowlife “democrats” made sure they succeeded.

[End Times Sentinel]

Well, maybe...
Really, if the ds are exposed for all their corruption, and I believe President Trump is a master at timing, nothing short of an all-out heist of the election will put the ds in power.
If, somehow, they do seize power, prepare for a civil war. Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die. But WAY more of the snowflakes will pay the wages of sin.