Posted on 07/31/2019 8:35:02 AM PDT by Ennis85
I will admit up front that I do not follow British politics particularly closely and that most of my friends who do were backing Boris Johnson for the leadership of the United Kingdom’s Tory party. He is, apparently, a conservative of sorts, although when anyone who is actually conservative presses his supporters on his specific credentials, I find they tend to mumble quite a bit. Unsurprisingly, the Mail on Sunday’s Burkean columnist Peter Hitchens is decidedly unimpressed with the new prime minister, who is now safely ensconced at 10 Downing Street.
Regardless of whether or not Johnson is a British-style Trumpian figure (the U.S. president now being the only point of reference the media seem capable of employing these days), his record on social issues is decidedly awful. He has been a staunch advocate of the LGBT movement for years, writing in 2012 that he was in favor of same-sex “marriage” and noting that he simply “can’t see what the fuss is about.” Further to that, he added, “[Marriage] may well be beloved by God, but no religion has ever had a monopoly on marriage.” In his recent role as foreign secretary, he went so far as to lift a ban on British embassies flying the rainbow flag, the banner of a sexually revolutionary movement.
Perhaps Johnson’s lackadaisical approach to the question of how his nation defined marriage was born out of his decidedly relaxed approach to the confines of his own. In 2004, he was fired by Tory leader Michael Howard from his dual roles as Conservative Party vice chairman and shadow arts minister for consistently deceiving pretty much everybody about an affair (one in a string of affairs that led to Johnson’s refusal to state for the record how many children he has). His first marriage, to socialite Allegra Mostyn-Owen, lasted only a year, and his affair with Petronella Wyatt came while he was married to his second wife, with whom he has four children.
The reason this affair is significant is because as it turns out, Johnson allegedly paid for Wyatt to get an abortion after she became pregnant. The child was unplanned and was aborted in October of 2004. The Sunday Times broke the story a month later, with Wyatt’s mother, Lady Verushka Wyatt, disclosing the abortion as well as the fact that Johnson had apparently promised to marry her daughter (who worked for The Spectator, where Johnson served as a columnist). Johnson’s compulsive deceit in the face of these allegations effectively killed his political career at the time. Fifteen years later, he’s made quite the comeback.
Johnson’s history with abortion may end up being politically significant, especially in regard to the case of Northern Ireland, which will be forced to legalize abortion by Westminster later this fall unless its own warring political factions manage to form government. Johnson’s voting record shows that he has thus far stood solidly with the abortion activists: he has abstained from all votes that would restrict abortion (which is legal in the United Kingdom up until 24 weeks). With the fact that one of his own children was aborted (a child who would now be a teenager) and that he most likely paid for it having been such public news, Johnson will probably be reluctant to take an even moderately pro-life position at any point.
Johnson’s supporters will point to the fact that he named the rock-ribbed pro-life conservative Jacob Rees-Mogg as the leader of the House of Commons, and that is certainly a positive development. But those currently expressing their excitement about Johnson’s rise to power should temper their enthusiasm: while Johnson may deliver on Brexit (and who knows?), it appears that he is another one of those Tories who likes to utilize red-meat rhetoric that sounds traditionalist but has worked as hard as any progressive to dismantle the socially conservative institutions and consensus that once made Great Britain great.
Same can be said about the EU.
Being pro-life is so unsophisticated and smells too much of Christianity.
Social conservatism is not a powerful political force in England. Criticizing the homosexual lifestyle or the epidemic of rape by men of Pakistani descent there earns a conversation with the police if not charges of hate speech. The politics are very different and there’s little use in applying US degrees of conservatism as a measuring stick. So yeah, except on Brexit, Boris is to the left of most American RINOs. But so what? Yes, life is He’s still miles better than Theresa May or any of the people he ran against.
“Yes, life is He’s still miles better than Theresa May or any of the people he ran against.”
I meant: “Yes, life is fundamental but he’s still miles better...”
That’s an issue for the Brits.
I don’t care.
Trump supports gay fake marriage. We work with what we got.
Trump supports gay fake marriage. We work with what we got.
I know Johnson is no conservative. Not in the sense that American conservatives would agree on. Two generations of British people, more in fact have been indoctrinated in socialism and have been disarmed. There is no Bill Of Rights in England and despite it’s history the British nation and it’s people really do not understand individual liberty, freedom from government intrusion tyranny and intrusion.
Let’s trash the new prime minister before he gets a chance to rule for even a day.
The man is a Trump ally.
Screw you mammon-worshipping fake conservatives. Your own sins are huge and many.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.