With all the liberties the Left is allowed to take, unchallenged by anyone until now, I really like how they get to redefine words to suit their cause of the day.
Racist... prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized
Now, they’ve taken it upon themselves to add a few more definitions....
1. not liking or agreeing with political leanings, beliefs, ideology of someone else is racist.
2. identifying a rat infested, shithole, violent democratically run city is racist.
Does anyone find if interesting that the last mayor, Pugh, was a fugitive from the law, after the FBI & IRS raided her offices. She dipped out for a day or two before a spokesperson said she was ill from the stress, if I recall. I’d imagine there was some stress, given the feds raided your offices. The other, Rawlings-Blake, gave the rioters permission to destroy the city and then hid behind Sharpton. You have to be pretty desperate and incompetent if your using him as your bodyguard.
In before humblegunner.
Nice column.
Trump is “keeping it 100” in regards to the disasters of South Central Los Angeles and Baltimore in their Congressional districts. The California 43rd Congressional District isn’t much better than the Maryland 7th Congressional District.
They’re all dancing to Trump’s tune. He knows he can push a button and all the Dems have to pivot and defend a sh*thole like Baltimore and a dunce like Cummings, instead of putting forward some policies that might actually win votes in the upcoming election.
Anyone that knows Trump, knows he’s not a racist. The folks making out that he is one are the racists.
LBJ’s and the DemoKKKrats War on Poverty has destroyed every city, which were sold into the WOP by the DemoKKKrats leaders in every city.
This War on Poverty was a new form of economic Slavery of black Americans living in the big cities, by the DemoKKKrats.
The politicians in control of these cities have gotten rich while their cities became rat infested $hitholes with increased poverty for the citizens in these cities.
The War on Poverty Wasn’t A Failure — It Was A Catastrophe
57,390 viewsMar 19, 2014, 11:52am
By: Louis Woodhill Contributor
I apply unconventional logic to economic issues.
Has the War on Poverty been a failure? Well, of course it has. If you devote 50+ years and $21.5 trillion (in 4Q 2013 dollars) to anything, and people are arguing about whether it was a success or a failure, then you can be sure that it was a failure.
Have you noticed that, 50+ years from its inception, no one is suggesting that the Apollo program was a failure? The Apollo program was an unchallenged success because it accomplished its stated goal: “…to land a man on the moon, and to return him safely to the earth.”
The stated goal of the War on Poverty, as enunciated by Lyndon Johnson on January 8, 1964, was, “…not only to relieve the symptom of poverty, but to cure it and, above all, to prevent it.”
Measured against this objective, the War on Poverty has not just been a failure, it has been a catastrophe. It was supposed to help America’s poor become self-sufficient, and it has made them dependent and dysfunctional.
Now, the faithful inner city Black voters for DemoKKKrats mayors, governors and congre$$its for decades are being abandoned as the illegals are now the #1 priority to the DemoKKKrats!
How crazy is it for them to say Trump’s racist because he’s demanding federal funds in black districts be used to benefit the citizens, instead of corrupt politicians. It will be interesting to see who the defrauded citizens side on this one.