p
Must be nice to have friends in high places.
L
What possible justification could there be for granting immunity and getting nothing in return?
How long till Nadler starts screaming his demands for every piece of paper that was generated during the decision-making process that preceeded this document release?
I’m sure there is a racist angle yet to play out here...
Equal justice under the law! ROTFLMAO!!
IOW, the DOJ/FBI were not conducting an investigation but were themselves part of a criminal conspiracy with Clinton to destroy evidence.
Okay, can these be undone or charges beyond there scope made? So many people in Obama administration got away with crimes that would put most of us in jail. How do we see justice done?
Americans live in a corrupt banana republic.
Those that are wise will keep that in mind, act accordingly, and keep their powder dry.
Criminals cannot give each other immunity to commit crimes.
Bkmk for later
The signers for the DOJ have been redacted. Why?
There won’t be a functioning Windows operating system by the time the doj agrees to reveal the contents of these laptops.
I would think this will not work because the FBI received nothing in return, which makes the argument they had no intention of prosecuting and were corrupt. Also if other crimes are discovered while investigating the Clinton foundation they can be charged. Were there clauses that granted immunity for receiving bribes? The immunity agreement would have to have covered all of the bases, which with the Clintons is tough to do.
When the screws are put on Comey I am sure he will think of a way to work around the agreement.
I not a lawyer, but I play one on FR. I’m supposing prosecutors are the ones that grant immunity instead of judges. Why not arrest the prosecutors that did this and send them to prison. I’ll bet when the sentencing starts, they will start singing about who told them what to do. If they did it on their own, throw the book at them. The legal field doesn’t need more crooks. Conspiracy, fraud, RICO, and that’s just what I thought up in 2 minutes. You shouldn’t need the destroyed evidence to prove that they gave immunity with nothing expected in return. Actually writing that they are allowed to destroy subpoenaed evidence is at least obstruction of justice. I’m sure an honest judge would look at this and smell a rat. You just can’t destroy evidence on a whim.
I believe it was this announcement that Joe Degenova used to start the “documents will be declassified this week” mantra.