Strange to say the least.
Posted on 07/27/2019 3:37:51 AM PDT by C19fan
A federal judge signed a strict protective order on Thursday, instructing Jeffrey Epstein and his counsel to not share any information about the case with non-vital third parties. Judge Richard Berman wrote in his opinion that any evidence or discovery obtained by the defense from prosecutors 'is not authorized to be disclosed to the public or disclosed beyond that which is necessary for the defense of this action.' This goes for certain documents in particular which 'would impede, if prematurely disclosed, the Government’s ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals.' That suggests that a number of people closer to Epstein could be called ion to provide testimony or even evidence in the case.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Sounds promising!
“Sounds promising!”
Actually, I think it’s to protect people like (potentially) the Clintons until the prosecution figures out how to burry their involvement. If the information gets out the damage to their political careers, and the careers of others since Epstein “collected” connected people, will be done by social media. Who needs the courts when a viral Facebook will reach more people than CBS, NBC and MSNBC combined?
The prosecution, which includes Mueller’s daughter, is likely as biased as Mueller’s investigation into Trump. And, no, prosecutors do not seek justice. They are politicians first and foremost. Having something on a high up politician can be great for their career. (Provided they don’t get Arkincided.)
Amazing Polly (youtube) has a new video out on Epstein’s connections
You are raining on my ray of sunshine, but you are most likely correct...
Strange to say the least.
Hi.
Maybe I misinterpreted the judge’s order, but sounds like he is concerned about the destruction of evidence, witness tampering and young girls showing up dead.
I’m not a lawyer, but I did stay at a Holiday yesterday.
5.56mm
I did stay at a Motel 6 last night, and I agree with you. I hear it could be an epidemic of Arkancide for Epstein and anybody around him.
That suggests that a number of people closer to Epstein could be called on to provide testimony or even evidence in the case.
Or will be charged on their own crimes...
This is always a tradeoff: if you let the info out, you have what we have now with the Mulehead/muh Russia stuff, which is EVERYONE knows everything, yet no one gets prosecuted.
If you keep it secret awaiting trial, yes he may well rat on others. In the meantime, no one knows anything.
Either way, it only matters if someone goes to jail-—in this case, someone other than Epstein.
“Sounds promising!”
Yeah. Promising for Clintons and Epstein’s other clients.
Priming the white wash. Nothing more.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.