Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Budget agreement could be reached today
Fox Business ^ | July 22, 2019 | Hillary Vaughn, Blake Burman, Chad Pergram

Posted on 07/22/2019 1:22:28 PM PDT by BeauBo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: bert
Nobody in the Congress wants the tariffs you are constantly hawking

That is exactly right. We have a corrupt government bought off by the Krotch Bros and other globlaist Free Traitors™ like you. The people want it. We are not stupid as you globalist think we are.

Again you coward, if a asked a Japanese, EU, South Korean, Chinese or a Vietnamese economists on the value of protectionist tariffs would they say they are a good thing or bad thing?

21 posted on 07/23/2019 5:44:43 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Except all the deficit hawks are also Free Traitors™ WHICH MAKES NO COMMON SENSE.

It does when you realize that their only loyalty is to themselves and their only ambition is to get reelected.

22 posted on 07/23/2019 5:48:53 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Protectionism is very popular ( besides being a common sense approach to trade) and one of the two parties is going to latch on to it. If the Democrats do then that will be the end of the Republican brand and good riddance.


23 posted on 07/23/2019 5:52:26 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

“Try as we might, we can’t get Congress to go on a spending diet.”

Even before President Trump was elected, I had heard that his strategic analysis was that straightening out the budget would have to be a second term effort, because of two main reasons.

1. Other major priorities were more time critical (rebuilding the Military, addressing China’s threat and controlling immigration).

2. Fixing the structural deficit is painful to enough people, as to make re-election unlikely - thereby sabotaging other critical efforts to save the Nation from falling.


24 posted on 07/23/2019 11:47:06 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“Krotch Bros”

Maybe you should trademark that one too. Creative.


25 posted on 07/23/2019 11:49:04 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“Krotch Bros”

Maybe you should trademark that one too. Creative.


26 posted on 07/23/2019 11:49:06 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

The repreentatives have delivered the message. We have other fish to fry and can not worry about the debt at present.


27 posted on 07/23/2019 11:50:06 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Valin

There has long been discussion (and planning) to address structural debt, in the second term.

The President re-iterated that intention, after the budget deal.


28 posted on 07/23/2019 11:55:18 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
>>>How do you justify a trillion-dollar deficit when the economy has been growing at the best rate in decades? What's going to happen when the economy goes into a downturn? What will the deficit be then? $2 trillion? $3 trillion?

Winner winner chicken dinner. I hope everyone finally gets it. And I hope everyone here will stop complaining about Obama running up a trillion a year...when we have a "GOP" president and Senate doing the exact same thing. I wish people would just stop making excuses for our trillion $ deficit so they can still crow about Obama's. The one thing I hate more than anything else is hypocrisy.

And your post is spot on. We were supposed to be working our way - NOT ONLY out of the year to year debt but also the total deficit. Nobody here wants to blame Trump...but guess what - he's got a veto pen and he promised he wasn't going to be signing another one of these bills (that was just March (?) of 2018. But then again, only the really naive should have thought that was possible.

This economy isn't going to grow like this for much longer. I give it less than a year to 18 months. Then our 1 trillion will be 2 (at least). Plus - because we are manipulating FED rates - we don't have a lot of wiggle room to soften the blow. Yeah - sounds like a good deal now but I don't think it will sound all that great when the excrement hits the rotator.

29 posted on 07/23/2019 12:16:08 PM PDT by NELSON111 (Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog show. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
There has long been discussion (and planning) to address structural debt, in the second term.

The President re-iterated that intention, after the budget deal.

And if you believe that is going to happen I have a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to talk to you about.

30 posted on 07/24/2019 3:46:43 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson