I don't think it's so much a matter of catching up.
I've been reading the Qute threads right along and
am quite familiar with all the theories and suppositions
and speculations. I just don't buy most of it.
You can hardly call someone uninformed if they've seen
the data (I'm being charitable with "data") and have
rejected it as nonsense or too implausible to be true.
But then again, I'm just another "SOB beyond the trees"
so what do I know? I might well be an undercover cabal agent.
Or mightn't I? ;-)
No, it is.
You've seen the data, now you just need to catch up on believing what is right before your eyes.
Gotta go, Humby. Feelin' not so good right now.
: (
p.s. I see what you did there, clever boy.
Why, HG! You quoted me. Now I’m the humble one.
I’m sincerely pleased you like to read the research thread. I think there is lots of good info there, links to other sources, connections being made. Regardless of “belief” or “disbelief” of the Team, the information is usually pretty solid. I don’t care whether someone does or does not read the drops. I like the intellectual digging of the facts and information that result.
It seems I’ve triggered you and another FReeper, so I’m offering some public explanation of “SOBs beyond the trees”. Aside from being a brilliantly alliterative turn of phrase, it’s evidently offensive to some people.
“beyond the trees” is a description of ignorant or ill-informed people OUTSIDE the magnificent digital estate of Free Republic. You know, places like twitter or facebook, and most of the internet.