Posted on 07/15/2019 5:31:26 PM PDT by Jack Black
A rather stunning report from Gateway Pundit outlines information contained within a lawsuit filing. The lawsuit, filed by Businessman Ed Butowsky, alleges Wikileaks founder Julian Assange confirmed to Fox News analyst Ellen Ratner that the DNC leaked emails were received from Seth Rich and his brother Aaron.
The details contained within the lawsuit filing (full pdf below) are stunning.
If this information is true and accurate, the DOJ claim of a Russian hack –based on assertions by DNC contractor, Crowdstrike– would be entirely false. Additionally the DC murder of Seth Rich would hold a far more alarming motive.
The ramifications here are almost too large to describe.
If this information turns out to be true and accurate, the entire narrative around the DNC “hack” will have been proven to be intentionally manufactured.
Despite the FBI’s prior admissions about never reviewing the DNC servers; and despite their recent admissions about never actually seeing the forensic computer analysis, the U.S. Department of Justice, specifically Robert Mueller, Andrew Weissmann and former DAG Rod Rosenstein, cannot blame a simple investigative ‘mistake‘ for the wrong attribution of who gave the DNC emails to Wikileaks.
The FBI, the DOJ and the Mueller special counsel have each purposefully claimed specific Russian actors were responsible for hacking the DNC in 2016. If it turns out those claims were based on falsehood, the integrity of the DOJ and Special Counsel collapses.
Mr. Butowsky is making a very serious allegation in this court filing.
Additionally, the previously discussed motive to arrest Julian Assange would now be further enhanced. Heck, the reason for Assange’ arrest would be brutally obvious.
♦Dana Boente was head of DOJ-NSD from May 11th, 2017 through end of October 2017 when he officially announced his intent to retire. However, the timeline gets cloudy here because Boente said he was staying on until an official replacement was announced. There’s no indication of when Boente actually left the DOJ-NSD or the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) role.
On January 23rd, 2018, FBI Director Christopher Wray announced Dana Boente had shifted over to the FBI to be Chief Legal Counsel (replacing James Baker) where Boente remains today. As Mueller was using 19 lawyers, and 50 FBI investigators, Boente was/is the legal counsel to FBI Director Christopher Wray while the Mueller probe was ongoing.
[Remember, Robert Mueller never interviewed Julian Assange. Additionally, it is worth noting for the U.S. side of the legal framework, the charges against Assange are not related to Russian efforts in a hack of the DNC; nor is Assange charged with anything related to the 2016 U.S. election interference activities, the Podesta email release or anything therein as previously described by the DOJ.]
There are two parts of Mueller's Russian Collusion story. Each of them is presented in it's own indictment. Last week we learned that the Judge in the Concord Consulting and Management (aka Russian Troll Farm) case has ordered the Government to stop saying that Concord was working for or an agent of the Russian Government. That is not alleged in the charges against them, but it is stated in the Mueller Report and in both Mueller and Barr's public statements as a fact.
Both sides (Concord and the DOJ) were instructed to file petitions for what the remedy has been for the State breaking rule 57, which essentially says that the prosecutor can't go around attacking the defendant with things that are not in the indictment.
Too late, they already did.
The most extreme remedy would be dismissal, I doubt they will get that, though.
But in any case when asked by some Congressman next week: "Do you allege that Concord was working for the Russians" the judge in the case has required that Mueller answer "No, we do not allege that".
So, 1 of the 2 "Russian cases" has gone badly off the rails. Even if Concord is found guilty of breaking some law (it's against the law to make sarcastic posts about elections if you are Russian? Who knew!) if the "hacking case" get's destroyed there is zero evidence of any Russian government interference in the election.
Despite what we've been told in "semi formal" documents like the Mueller Report and the Joint Finding of 2017.
“leaked emails were received from Seth Rich and his brother Aaron”
I hope this brother is very careful.
[I hope this brother is very careful.]
The “tragic accident” has probably already been planned.
Sure is odd that all the email leaks stopped in the immediate aftermath of Seth Rich being murdered.
And 15 days before Hillary was feted at the DNC Convention - by Bernie Sanders, no less.
Probably all just a set of amazing coincidences.
The only “botched” part is that it took a few hours for him to die.
i HAVE suspected this from the get go. IT specialists did studies to discover hack downloads vs thumb drive they went to like over in eastern Europe somewhere an no where near as fast as this was downloaded hence it was inside thumb drive. I hope they keep JULIAN alive. I have no idea why the RICH family did not get behind this. probably paid off who knows.Another victim of the CLINTON CRIME CABAL!riP seth
may you get justice soon!
Hoping but skeptical.....
“I have no idea why the RICH family did not get behind this. probably paid off”
“paid off” = “threatened”. And then the family demanded that Hannity STFU about it, too. (Which he did.)
There is another Rich son.
Democrats murdered Seth Rich...PERIOD
Seth was essentially a communist or socialist, and was working for th Democratic Party, supporting Bernie.
So perhaps it is party loyalty. Back when the Communist Party of the USSR was the leader of world socialism many true believers sacrificed family members, some even ratting out their husbands, wives, children and parents. All for the good of "the movement" and "the party".
Now that the USA Democratic Party has become the leading purveyor of high proof Socialism, perhaps it gets the same loyalty from Card Carrying Members (and even some Fellow Travelers and Useful Idiots).
Everybody did.
Reminds me of the way “birthers” were shouted down.
We were right on both counts.
p
Assange says it then it should be looked into. Lawsuit? Drumroll territory.
Podesta is on record as saying someone has to pay, someone has
to be made an example to prevent future links. That “example”
was Seth Rich.
Just how is the general public equipped to verify this information? It’s news. It’s published. So what? Will gladly let this run its course through qualified courts and law enforcement.
O wait. Those are corrupt to the core. The MSM is corrupt to the core. Time for some popcorn.
There is a reason the FBI did not examine the DNC computers.
They did not want to know Seth Rich was the Wikileaker.
I’ve always believed this to be the case. The problem with allowing Assange to talk is he may want to say a lot of other things that the deep state wants very much to keep secret.
For those that don’t know..this was Ellen’s brother. Lawyer for Assange
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ratner
Gee, it’s almost like someone is slowing turning up the heat on a big pot of Democrat frogs. Now who would do that? DJT
Beat me to it.
Nothing George Webb didn’t tell us 2 and a half years ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.