Posted on 07/11/2019 4:18:10 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
Bizarre beyond belief. Who knew there was such a thing as anti-homeless architecture?
Also, what victim group gets priority here? Gays, homeless, non-European origin city commission members....?
Shhhh. Don’t give them any ideas. :)
Yeah, pretty amazing to read an article and come away more confused than before.
1. Put Zen garden in front of restaurant to show cultural appropriation appreciation;
2. Paint rock in garden rainbow to kick tradition in the face in order to celebrate perversity alternate sexuality.
3. Activists decide rock itself is a manifestation of anti-homelessness because it blocks a garden no one could sleep in anyway;
4. Restaurant closes, decamps the madhouse and runs for safer ground in Sausalito.
Of these, only activity 4 is the sign of sanity. San Francisco is doomed.
Sounds like whomever wrote that was a liberal on drugs!
Betcha if you got them off the record they’d admit the rock was put there to keep the GD homeless bums away.
Just whats posted here I feel like Im reading a foreign language.
More proof that most liberals have mental problems, abuse drugs/alcohol and should stop writing any opinion stuff.
While hes at it why dont he just roll in a pile of dung and wear sackcloth and ashes?
Well so much for tomorrows surprise, some people can be so insensitive... .
ROFL
Rocks?
Coalition on Homelessness.
Right.
They are so nuts now that when the next generation comes up it will be worse that Escape from New York in that everyone there is at each other's throats but nobody wants to leave.
.
However, from the article......which was painted rainbow for LGBT Pride Month.
It appears that rocks have long had a male gender assigned to them. Not sure about transrocks...
Maybe the homeless were also toiletless and were using the Zen rock as a poop John.
The Coalition on Homeless is not crazy. It’s organized and run by richly-funded social service organizations. To protect their budgets they have to deploy a constant escalating barrage of shame, guilt and misplaced sympathy upon business owners and property owners in order to keep perpetuate San Francisco’s sanctuary-city policy for the mentally-ill addicts and gutter drunks who wear the label “homeless” in San Francisco.
(In many other parts of California, there are lots of people who fit the more ordinary definition of homeless - people living out of cars and tents because of sky-high rents. Their are issues associated with them, of course ... but NOTHING like what San Francisco puts up with.)
Well, if we can vote our preference, I vote we force all these addicts/degenerate druggies to the mojave into tents in cages. Let them languish there for a few years until they get their minds right.
My wife's uncle went through that with Sheriff Joe and cleaned him right up.
Well, it is a cheap solution.
Many older apartment bldgs. in NYC had these spiked strips atop the cast iron fencing around the entranceways to discourage “hoodlums”, “vagrants” and “riff raff” from loitering around. I’m surprised the ACLU never sued to have them removed.
Don't order the rainbow trout anywhere in SF...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.