Ross Perot was going to win the race.
Time to relook as to why he dropped out then dropped back in the race.
That was what spilled his momentum. Otherwise he had the race won.
Wow. Never really thought about it that way before. We have been saddled with Bush/Clinton ever since.
I suppose the obvious symptom was the first Bush? After that it was all deep state run characters !
Ross Perot was going to win the race.
Time to relook as to why he dropped out then dropped back in the race.
That was what spilled his momentum. Otherwise he had the race won.
I don't know if he would've won outright, but he would've had a more impactful presence on election day had he not dropped out. I suspect he might've pulled off a few southern states and possibly Maine for a George Wallace-like result.
Ross Perot was leading both Bush and Clinton in the summer of 1992. An astonishing achievement for an Independent who just months earlier entered the race and had to scramble to get his name on general election ballots in all 50 states. The establishment was in a real panic.
Something happened to make Perot drop out of the race and it wasn’t about not wanting to disrupt his daughters wedding. We may never know the full story.
The establishment were scared of Perot but not so much with Trump. They never thought Trump would win.
These are my thoughts on him. They don’t match your post precisely, but there is food for thought in it.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3762896/posts?page=72#72
He said he dropped out because the Bushes were going after his kids.