To: rogerantone1
6 posted on
07/04/2019 9:30:21 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Capitalism produces EVERYTHING Socialists/Communists/Democratic-Socialists wish to "redistribute.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So I was right in #3 that they are mining their history now. This must mean that they fear conservatives will be more on guard when posting in the future, and so Twitter needs to find ex post facto justifications now to silence people.
-PJ
10 posted on
07/04/2019 9:43:13 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Utter nonsense
There was absolutely NOTHINGG WRONG with that
Jack of Twitter is a total JackAss
Put him on The List
11 posted on
07/04/2019 9:44:15 AM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
(Pussie Smollett, Mizzou, campus fake nooses, fake "protests" FAKE EVERYTHING Hey CNN? lol)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
12 posted on
07/04/2019 9:45:40 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If that is the Tweet that got him banned, free speech is in serious jeopardy. His Tweet contained no threats, no obscenities, and did not attack any individual or group. It was a claim about what was in the NZ killer's manifesto, and did not defend him or his actions.
I haven't read the manifesto, so I can't swear to the accuracy of Lott's Tweet, but it seems consistent with what I have read elsewhere. But even if inaccurate, does that justify having your account closed? Is every inaccurate Tweet dealt with in the same manner? If so, Twitter would be shutting down thousands of accounts every day.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
