Skip to comments.WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE TRUTH OF BENGHAZI: IRANíS QUDS FORCE AND SULEIMANI LED ATTACKS AGAINST AMERI
Posted on 07/03/2019 9:32:41 PM PDT by bitt
New information regarding the September 11, 2012 attacks on the U.S. diplomatic outpost and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya and on the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt has been brought forward by former U.S. military personnel who were on duty that fateful night. These whistleblowers reveal that the attackers in Benghazi were led by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force, under the command of Iranian General Qassem Suleimani.
Qassem Suleimani, a fanatical Islamic revolutionary, has rapidly become one of the worlds top terrorist suspects, as well as a powerful and sinister force within Iran according to The Telegraph. U.S. officials knew that the Quds Force was coordinating and leading the attacks in Benghazi. U.S. military forces were ordered not to track or to pursue the Benghazi attackers, whistleblowers confirmed. According to Kenneth R. Timmerman, the Benghazi attack was funded with hard cash in the form of Euros smuggled into Libya from Malaysia for the Iranian Quds Force. ADVANCED WARNINGS IGNORED The human intelligence (HUMINT) warnings began on June 2, 2012, steadily became more serious, and started coming in via much higher-level sources. By September 1, 2012, the warnings were severe enough to warrant removing all key personnel from the areas affected, the most threatened area being Benghazi. All classified or sensitive information, equipment, and personnel of key positions, under policy, were supposed to be moved to a more secure location. On the night of the attacks, at least 35 Americans were still stationed at the State Department and CIA facilities in Benghazi.
Signals intelligence began corroborating the human intelligence already coming in, verifying the threat levels. Inexplicably, security was lessened in the areas that were targeted, even after multiple requests to increase security. On or about May 9, 2012, even more security personnel were removed for unknown reasons. SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 On September 11, 2012, when the attacks began in Benghazi, CENTCOM was conducting a training exercise known as Internal Look 12 (IL 12). CENTCOM did not stop the training event until eight hours after the attacks began. During the attacks, no one was allowed to stop training in order to engage the attacking terrorists. At AFRICOM, they contacted every intelligence agency. They called the watch desk. They notified the U.S. Navy 6th Fleet. They reached out to Joint Operations Command (JOC). The commanding officer at AFRICOM told them they could do nothing. U.S. military aircraft, ships, pararescue teams, and special operators were ordered not to respond, according to whistleblowers who were on duty during the attacks in Benghazi. A Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) pararescue team was on 24-7 standby at AFRICOMs Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti, a small African nation north of Somalia.
BS. It was Hillary’s goons cleaning up a loose end for Her.
Might this lead to a resolution of the Benghazi questions?
Nice to see the Obvious on Hillary/ State Dept/Benghazi surfacing, finally.
I recall Gowdy saying that expecting anything to come of his Committee investigation on Benghazi wasnt going to happen under Obamas Administration. This was before it started, because already Congress was being denied or stonewalled of documents.
Gowdy & Committee were the first to expose the missing emails.
It seems plausible that Zero and Hildy had made a deal for Amb. Stevens to be kidnapped and exchanged for the Blind Sheik. The CIA mercenary contractors at the Annex did not know and did their duty - as they saw it. The unexpected forceful resistance angered those behind the attack force so they turned on the Annex.
Orders from the top in D.C. down each chain of command was Stand Down. No U.S. military unit can enter on foreign soil with hostile intent without a verifiable order from the Commander in Chief... it is potentially an act of war. So - where did the Stand Down order originate?
Also provides proof of a traitorous media for being silent about all of this, writing off American fighting heroes without so much as a by your leave. A dark day, one among many, during the time of the previous administration.
This sounds more like a manufactured reason for the neocons to get their war with Iran.
If true this would mean it was not a terrorist attack, but a military asssult against the US. If true then Obama knew it and was not willing to go to war against his friends.
Riiiight the neocons make Iranians blow up stuff, take hostages, shout ‘Death to America,’ send their scientists to North Korea to work in the Nork nuke program... if It wasn’t for neocons Iranian mullahs would be saints.
Exactly. The same paymaster was paying both the attacked and the attackers in Benghazi. Lying scum like Brennan could never get the lie of, "OMG, that Islamophobic little video caused it", float so now they can try to take advantage of the fact that not many people have swallowed their BS about Benghazi by spinning a different set of details to serve their agenda.
Just like Fake News is the norm, Fake Intelligence is the norm for the US government ever since Bill and Hillary Clinton moved into the Whitehouse.
The attackers who hit the Embassy in Benghazi didn't need Iranian help, the CIA and MI6 had been paying, training, and arming, radical Islamists in Libya for several decades.
Libya was the ideal central location for useful idiot Islamic radicals after the Soviets left Afghanistan. From the parts of Libya the government never had more than partial control of such proxies could cause trouble not only in Libya, but Egypt, Sudan, Chad, Niger, Algeria, and Tunisia, as well.
so the obama=clinton pallets of cash was PAYOFF
for the murder of the Ambassador.
This report re: Benghazi coming out now? And you take it as gospel? You must have really been broken up over that baby milk factory back in the day, too.
Inexplicably, security was lessened in the areas that were targeted, even after multiple requests to increase security.
Someone should get to the bottom of who was in charge of the State Dept and the military in those days.
Why was America ordered to stand down and not defend America against an Iranian attack? And why would any American worth his salt follow such an illegal order? One of the basic premises of existence is that you always have the duty to protect yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.