Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. Assembly Approves Resolution That Calls for Church Acceptance of LGBTQ
The New American ^ | 02 July 2019 | Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

Posted on 07/03/2019 11:52:33 AM PDT by detective

he California State Assembly voted 9-2 to send to the state senate a resolution calling on “religious leaders to counsel on LGBTQ matters from a place of love, compassion, and knowledge of the psychological and other harms of conversion therapy.”

While no one would argue with the aim of being more loving and more compassionate in our counsel of our fellow man, the people’s representatives do not possess any authority in the arena of religious practice.

Article I, Section 4 of the California Constitution reads, in relevant part: “Free exercise and enjoyment of religion without discrimination or preference are guaranteed. This liberty of conscience does not excuse acts that are licentious or inconsistent with the peace or safety of the State. The Legislature shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

Regardless of those restrictions, lawmakers in the California Assembly have chosen to ignore their state’s constitution and to introduce a measure that, should it ever become binding law, would drastically shrink the scope of religious liberty in the Golden State.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: churches; homosexuals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Any kind of conversion therapy has already been declared illegal in California.

This resolution will penalize any religious community in California, that practices their faith and stands up for what they believe.

This could not be more clear, it is a direct violation of First Amendment rights to freedom of religion.

1 posted on 07/03/2019 11:52:33 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

Unconstitutional.

Next...


2 posted on 07/03/2019 11:54:48 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

a vote of 9-2? That can’t be right. There are 80 members of the CA Assembly.


3 posted on 07/03/2019 11:54:51 AM PDT by married21 ( As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Earth to the California State Assembly - Butt out.


4 posted on 07/03/2019 11:55:22 AM PDT by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Nothing is unconstitutional until John Roberts takes a poll.


5 posted on 07/03/2019 11:55:39 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: detective

And they will of course look the other way when the Muslim Imams tell them to shove it up their collective Obamaholes.


6 posted on 07/03/2019 11:55:41 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
You WILL
7 posted on 07/03/2019 11:55:50 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Or else they’ll do what exactly?


8 posted on 07/03/2019 11:55:54 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Pole or poll?


9 posted on 07/03/2019 11:56:28 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Good point. I may be wrong. ;)


10 posted on 07/03/2019 11:58:43 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: detective

You’re absolutely right, it’s unconstitutional.


11 posted on 07/03/2019 12:00:27 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

One wonders if it applies to mosques. Somehow I doubt it.


12 posted on 07/03/2019 12:03:19 PM PDT by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

13 posted on 07/03/2019 12:03:32 PM PDT by red-dawg (Climate change caused the end of the Ice Age. Did man play a part in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

I doubt if there ever was conversion therapy as it exists in the liberal mind. Fake News abounds.


14 posted on 07/03/2019 12:06:31 PM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

They’re just paving the way for the day the governor decides to be honest with himself and step out of the closet he appears to have hidden in for so many years. (Just my humble opinion, y’know.)


15 posted on 07/03/2019 12:06:52 PM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

The headline should be something like:

California Passes Law Forcing ISLAM to accept Sodomy, threatens Prison for Imams


16 posted on 07/03/2019 12:08:30 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: red-dawg

Boy aint the truth.

I was in San Francisco area this past weekend. The big Pride parade was this past weekend. EVERY business large and small had rainbows in billboards and on their windows. I guess so as to not have their windows broken out. Really sick pandering. I stayed way north of the city during that time.


17 posted on 07/03/2019 12:09:30 PM PDT by Texas resident (Democrats=Enemy of People of The United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: detective

Does this apply to Mosques as well? Muslims don’t like LGBTs either.


18 posted on 07/03/2019 12:26:53 PM PDT by david1292
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Where’s that separation of church and state now?


19 posted on 07/03/2019 12:30:25 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Only unconstitutional if John Roberts says so. You never know these days.


20 posted on 07/03/2019 12:32:15 PM PDT by david1292
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson