"The list of demands also included stipulations against law enforcement, calling for "no police within the Pride Parade and no police presence at any Pride celebration, march or demonstration. The system of policing upholds white supremacy, hetero-patriarchy, gender binaries, and capitalist rule.""Anarchy, anyone?
To: chief lee runamok
2 posted on
06/30/2019 4:00:55 PM PDT by
EEGator
To: chief lee runamok
Insanity. Acted out by criminality
3 posted on
06/30/2019 4:01:27 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: chief lee runamok
I bet a lot of SF cops would gladly not be forced to march or police the Freak Parade
4 posted on
06/30/2019 4:02:10 PM PDT by
C19fan
To: chief lee runamok
“no police within the Pride Parade and no police presence at any Pride celebration, march or demonstration. The system of policing upholds white supremacy, hetero-patriarchy, gender binaries, and capitalist rule.”
I’ve never read a gayer, more liberal sentence ever...
5 posted on
06/30/2019 4:03:10 PM PDT by
EEGator
To: chief lee runamok
That’s some pretty deep stuff there. I thought Pride was just about celebrating certain sex acts.
To: chief lee runamok
When all of the big tech companies are infested with leftists determined to smother conservative voices, it’s fascinating that the big tech companies are all uniformly hated by other leftists.
To: chief lee runamok
11 posted on
06/30/2019 4:14:46 PM PDT by
Chode
(Send bachelors, and come heavily armed!)
To: chief lee runamok
The freaks took over SF a long time ago. They own it.
12 posted on
06/30/2019 4:15:08 PM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: chief lee runamok
Sharia Law would do wonders for San Fransicko’s pervy problems.
14 posted on
06/30/2019 4:16:10 PM PDT by
tflabo
(Prince of Peace, Lion of Righteousness)
To: chief lee runamok
So I guess the gay cop in the Village People has to go?
(IIRC that guy wasnt gay)
To: chief lee runamok
Offended by things you disagree with? WELCOME TO MY WORLD!. Sorry snowflakes, that's the way it is. Freedom of expression still means something. If the ACLU was right about ONE thing it was when fmr director Norm Seigal said, for all practicality the 1A doesn't protect free speech, it's their to protect unpopular speech. You can NONVIOLENTLY argue, debate and express a different viewpoint. Or walk away. "Don't like my music/you don't have to use it" (the Brothers Johnson). And another thing, to quote Sen. Hubert Humphrey, your right to free speech DOES NOT mean I have an obligation to listen.
16 posted on
06/30/2019 4:19:34 PM PDT by
Impala64ssa
(Virtue signalling is no virtue)
To: chief lee runamok
The "Village People" are deeply saddened by this development.
To: chief lee runamok
Police? 🚨🚓🚒🚑
20 posted on
06/30/2019 4:25:45 PM PDT by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: chief lee runamok
“Buh, buh., but Goooogle IS you queers— and we show our PRIDE for your perversion in ALL of our search engines— we try to tell everyone how normal your queers are... don’t you SEE that?”
Crocodile tears for giggle... they deserve everything they get. and then some— tech lords. should be broken up into a thousand companies.
28 posted on
06/30/2019 4:48:08 PM PDT by
John S Mosby
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: chief lee runamok
There is nothing to be proud of by being a homo
32 posted on
06/30/2019 5:40:30 PM PDT by
okie 54
To: chief lee runamok
So Google who is as pro gay as it gets is their enemy?
39 posted on
06/30/2019 10:19:00 PM PDT by
aquila48
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
