To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
They want it both ways.
They want to be a platform when it comes to liability.
They want to be a publisher so they can censor people they hate.
Can’t have it but ways.
3 posted on
06/29/2019 7:32:59 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Capitalism produces EVERYTHING Socialists/Communists/Democratic-Socialists wish to "redistribute.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
☑
4 posted on
06/29/2019 7:33:48 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Gab actually seems to identify itself as a publisher, and yet it respects free speech more than Twatter does.
6 posted on
06/29/2019 7:35:11 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Turn them into utilities.
Not responsbile for content, unable to do anything with content.
Let the users have and use censoring aps to strain it.
11 posted on
06/29/2019 7:47:13 PM PDT by
Chickensoup
(Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They want it both ways.
They want to be a platform when it comes to liability.
They want to be a publisher so they can censor people they hate.
Can’t have it but ways.
Exactly!
17 posted on
06/29/2019 8:05:41 PM PDT by
Freedom56v2
(#KATE'SWALL Build it Now)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
22 posted on
06/29/2019 8:39:37 PM PDT by
libertylover
(Democrats hated Lincoln too.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Can’t have it but ways. That was a slip of the tongue.
24 posted on
06/29/2019 8:45:57 PM PDT by
Osage Orange
(Whiskey Tango Foxtrot)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson