Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump seeks 2020 census delay after Supreme Court blocks citizenship question
Fox News ^ | June 27, 2019 | Ronn Blitzer, Adam Shaw

Posted on 06/27/2019 11:55:14 AM PDT by Innovative

President Trump vowed Thursday to try delaying the 2020 census after the Supreme Court blocked, for now, his administration's plan to include a question that inquires about citizenship status.

The court had said that the administration's explanation for adding the question was insufficient and sent it back to the lower courts for further consideration. The ruling marked a major setback for the administration. While more lower-court litigation is possible, it would be difficult for the government to get the question on the census in time for the forms to be printed by their original self-declared summer deadline.

But Trump raised the possibility of a delay until a final resolution by the courts. In a fiery Twitter response to the narrow ruling, Trump said it "seems totally ridiculous" for the government not to ask such a "basic question."

"I have asked the lawyers if they can delay the Census, no matter how long, until the ... United States Supreme Court is given additional information from which it can make a final and decisive decision on this very critical matter," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2020census; census; scotus; trump; trump45
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Good. Too bad about the SCOTUS ruling, but Trump is not giving up.
1 posted on 06/27/2019 11:55:14 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Our Man Don!!!!


2 posted on 06/27/2019 11:56:45 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

They’d lie about it anyway. “Citizen? Yup”


3 posted on 06/27/2019 11:58:48 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

PS: Or “Si”


4 posted on 06/27/2019 11:59:22 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

More Bush-wacking for US citizens.


5 posted on 06/27/2019 12:02:23 PM PDT by YouGoTexasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Conservatives are wasting time worrying about judges. We are NEVER going to win anything meaningful through the courts. we need judicial reform that holds judges accountable and does away with lifetime appointments. Judges were never meant to run this country.


6 posted on 06/27/2019 12:03:41 PM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

7 posted on 06/27/2019 12:04:50 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

The census requirement is set by the Constitution. Courts aren’t going to overturn that. It’s got to be done in 2020.


8 posted on 06/27/2019 12:06:00 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Article 1, Section2, Clause III

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.


9 posted on 06/27/2019 12:06:10 PM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
we need judicial reform that holds judges accountable

By all appearances that is going to require large numbers of lampposts and sturdy rope.


10 posted on 06/27/2019 12:06:13 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

“TRUMPIE”, the overwhelming numbers of the American people and voters are behind you...100%...period!!!


11 posted on 06/27/2019 12:06:56 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

A South Texas School of Law professor says this is Roberts splitting the SC rulings. One for the libs, one for the conservatives. Said it’s “contrived”. Is there a way to at least take the “Chief Justice” title away from him?


12 posted on 06/27/2019 12:08:14 PM PDT by Terry Mross (I'ma)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Only impeachment by the House, and conviction and removal by the Senate.


13 posted on 06/27/2019 12:08:57 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill & Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Scotus adjourned. When do they reconvene?


14 posted on 06/27/2019 12:10:17 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

The better question on Census form should be:

Which country you are citizen of!

And give them a list of 10 countries near USA to choose from.


15 posted on 06/27/2019 12:12:19 PM PDT by entropy12 (Learn all you can from the mistakes of others. You won't have time to make them all yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Scotus adjourned. When do they reconvene?

First Monday in October.

16 posted on 06/27/2019 12:12:57 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

then I guess we can just add the populations of El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and Mexico to the Census for representation.p


17 posted on 06/27/2019 12:13:18 PM PDT by epluribus_2 (he had the best mom - rever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
Article 1, Section2, Clause III

That was modified by the 14th Amendment, but neither one specifies counting only citizens.

18 posted on 06/27/2019 12:14:33 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
It IS totally ridiculous!

"Are you a citizen of the USA?"

There is NOTHING wrong with that questions.

There is PLENTY wrong with Roberts and the rest of the Supreme Court "justices" to whom "2 + 2 = 5"

George Orwell was a profit. His nightmare is a reality in 21st century America.

BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU

19 posted on 06/27/2019 12:14:52 PM PDT by Savage Beast (When the Light of Truth threatens to expose corruption, it's the corrupt who try to extinguish it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist
we need judicial reform that holds judges accountable and does away with lifetime appointments.

You would need a constitutional amendment for that.

20 posted on 06/27/2019 12:15:38 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson