So many “ifs.”’
Moore lost because he was a horrid candidate with a past he failed to defend, even during a “friendly” interview.
We need that seat back... for God’s sake, AMERICA needs that seat back. The balance of the Senate is far too precarious to bet it all on a at-best 50-50 prospect of winning in an R+28 state.
If he was a "horrid" candidate, why did he get more votes than Richard Shelby, who is the other Senator from Alabama?
I know you want to believe what you have had people repeating to you constantly, but you need to think for yourself and stop buying into assertions that are without merit.
Moore was a perfectly good candidate until the media-weapon and Republican backstabbing did him in.
The balance of the Senate is far too precarious to bet it all on a at-best 50-50 prospect of winning in an R+28 state.
How do you get your 50-50 number? What methodology did you use to come up with that value? Sounds like a wild @$$ed guess to me.
Let me show you my math.
Donald Trump received 1.3 million votes in 2016. He will get either that or more in 2020.
Doug Jones got 670,000 votes in 2017. The differential between him and Trump is 630,000 votes.
Alabama Republicans would have to give 1.3 million votes to Donald Trump, and then 630,000 of those people would have to refuse to vote for Moore.
Do you really believe that half of Trump's voters are going to toss the race to the Democrat because they hate Moore?
I give that 100-1 odds of happening. (Since we are pulling numbers out of our @$$.)
If Moore wins the nomination, he wins period. He takes the whole enchilada. Losing is a virtual impossibility.