These people will say anything for pay whopping check. That is their job: to be rich and famous. They are mostly shallow entertainers who will smile into the camera and tell you lies that will make your hair curl. The crazier the lines and the more your hair curls, the smarter and creative they think they are. But take away the money and camera and they wither up as dried prunes or old shoes. They serve a measly and dishonest function, but with their money and fame to remind them how important they are, they can brow beat you till the cows come home. Such is modern entertainment.
Birds of a feather...
She went all in with the Russian hoax, and now even her low IQ followers have abandoned her as a biased liar.
She went all in with the Russian hoax, and now even her low IQ followers have abandoned her as a biased liar.
Some people believe Rosie O'Donnell could stand to lose 5 or 6 pounds.
Just a guess, but clearly Rachel has outlived his usefulness to the NYT and is now considered a liability. Makes me wonder what the NYT thinks is coming.
Maddow is TMZ for politics. qualifying idiotic statements with the word “if” doesn’t add any credibility, like “we’ve never had to contend with the possibility that the President is an agent of a foreign power”. So stupid. “If my grandma had balls she’d be my grandpa”. And if she really had any principle, she would know you don’t have to be this extreme to find a lot of problems. People in power don’t have to be an foreign agent to make decisions that are bad for the country - they just have to be greedy or corrupt. Like selling off our Uranium, or flying to China to get $3 billion, or sending planeloads of cash and gold into Iran instead of wire-transfer (especially after we had re-established the banking relationship!). And, this one really is curious: Why did the USA pay its debts to Iran in Euro notes? None of this is of interest to anyone in the MSM.
The whole Russia thing was so stupid but she took stupid to the extreme. We’ve all known Trump as a pop icon for more than 40 years. He had a 10 year run on a network TV show. He owns all kinds of properties, had all kinds of government contracts and permits. Exactly when, why, how would he suddenly become a Russian agent? The entire thing was manufactured and any person with a lick of sense would know it. Sure, nobody has to like him but the complete derangement she displays is baffling. But, she got ratings and $10 million a year for it. NYT would be wise to steer clear of her. But sadly the “middle of the road” news isn’t all that much more reasonable either.
I’m speaking to the choir here but the NYT and MSM made a concerted effort to minimize the many bad decisions made by Obama, by Clinton, by the federal branches over the years. The principle of a media being a watchdog against government abuse is a serious calling. It’s not an excuse for partisanship but that’s what it as become. They all just report what their “anonymous government sources” tell them.. and it’s very convenient that these sources as “anonymous” because it allows the media to pick and choose the narrative they want to sell without any consequence. It doesn’t benefit the source to be anonymous - it benefits the media’s efforts at propagandizing.