Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump says he was briefed on Navy sightings of UFOs; 'Do I believe it? Not particularly'
FoxNews.com ^ | Louis Casiano

Posted on 06/15/2019 6:03:31 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: McGruff
The President didn't say he doesn't believe it.

His answer was "not particularly." That is most certainly not a firm "NO"...

That is a wiggle word used for a precise reason.

The President may speak "Queens" English (as in the NYC Borough of Queens), but he does so very effectively and precisely. He almost always says what he means and means what he says...if you interpret his Queens vernacular into 'Merican English.

In this case, he bobbed to avoid the punch thrown by little Steffie. When ask if he was ready to make UFO disclosure to the American public, he said, "not particularly" and then followed it by telling little Georgie that he "would be the first to know."

One might interpret that as saying, "well, Georgie, I'm not ready to disclose whatever I know to YOU."

As an aside, you will notice that the President smiled when asked about the subject of UFO's. That smile is known in the trade (the trade being those who study lying like FBI analysts, the police, and psychologists) as an expression of "duping delight."

It tells us that the President was "duping" little Georgie about this subject of UFO's. From the point of view of those who study lying, it might be concluded that the President's comment to Steffie, mixed as it was with a smile of "duping delight," conveyed that the truth is counter/contra to what he was saying. The truth being that he was briefed on the subject and understands perfectly well the significance of all this UFO stuff (whether the sightings were enemy craft or otherwise).

61 posted on 06/16/2019 3:47:39 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
Stephanie must have stayed awake all night after the interview....trying to think if he got ANYTHING applicable to impeachment.

Stephanie IS INDEED a little wise guy.

62 posted on 06/16/2019 3:59:17 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The best thing about getting my clearance was the UFO ride after signing all the paperwork.


63 posted on 06/16/2019 4:02:55 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Trump knew exactly what he was getting into. He is just toying with them.


64 posted on 06/16/2019 4:03:28 AM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

+.


65 posted on 06/16/2019 4:05:37 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Empire_of_Liberty

“He’s made some great points with this Snuffelupegas interview, and on ‘normal’ television, that a lot of Americans still watch.”

I have to agree with that. Like in the Bible, Paul went to where the sinners were. How else would they hear the truth?


66 posted on 06/16/2019 4:11:04 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Seems like sightings of little green men getting off flying saucers have decreased dramatically now that mobile video cameras are ubiquitous.


67 posted on 06/16/2019 4:19:45 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Breaking news: “Trump Calls Navy Pilots Liars”


68 posted on 06/16/2019 4:26:51 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (I'm in the cleaning business.......I launder money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Heheh. Eggzactly.


69 posted on 06/16/2019 5:07:24 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

A few blurry pictures and pictures, also blurry and long telephoto pictures, of ares 51. The usual.


70 posted on 06/16/2019 5:54:32 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline
A few blurry pictures and pictures, also blurry and long telephoto pictures, of ares 51. The usual.

If that were all it was, this subject wouldn't have made it into a Presidential briefing and emerged as a winner in the extreme competition of those handful of questions to be posed to the President on national TV.

71 posted on 06/16/2019 6:25:29 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

72 posted on 06/16/2019 7:27:18 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

That is one explanation I find steeped in ignorance and superstition. It is such a narrow view of the Creation to be just plain childish.


73 posted on 06/16/2019 9:12:26 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
We are talking about UFOs...little green men types of things...where to date we have zero physical evidence and sightings are blown off as being weather balloons etc....and my picture is steeped in ignorance and superstition? Wait till you see my pics on Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster.

HAVING SAID THAT, the most PLAUSIBLE argument I've read is something like the following:

-light-speed travel (as we envision it) is fraught with peril...the devastation if you hit a tiny piece of rock grows as your speed accelerates. Thus a pebble kicking up and hitting your windshield at 55mph may cause a crack; at light-speed your space craft is destroyed. So, compound that probability of a piece of space debris being in your path across scores of light years.

-demons are fallen angels. They really don't like us. In fact they hate us, but they are sneaky and understand us better than we know oure lives. They know our Achilles heel.

-(fallen) angels are spirits and not subject to material limitations so the aforementioned light-speed problems don't apply to them.

So, logically then...if there are simply too many UFO sightings and pictures etc to blow it off as Swamp gas, AND if it's physically unlikely for aliens to survive travel across the vast distances of space, AND if fallen angels hate us and want to destroy us, AND if they know our fascination with aliens, AND they can travel from here to there without limitation...

74 posted on 06/16/2019 9:41:01 AM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
It was a setup.

If he’d have said ANYTHING besides no, they were going to say he was totally nuts.

Exactly. The left has been pushing the "Trump is mentally unstable" narrative a lot recently. This question was posed to him in the hope that it would feed into that narrative ("Trump sees little green men!") These journalists are the same people who thought it was "charming" when Hillary Clinton claimed she sat in the White House and had conversations with the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt.

75 posted on 06/16/2019 9:54:51 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Oh yeah, well... sure, I’ll go! Bring on the probing!


76 posted on 06/16/2019 10:50:15 AM PDT by jmacusa ("If wisdom is not the Lord, what is wisdom?''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“If that were all it was, this subject wouldn’t have made it into a Presidential briefing”

That is all it was. People love to hear claims of sightings of aliens.

I respect the pilots that say they saw something but please, pilots, take decent pictures of what you saw. Radar watchers, show us you radar images.

Aircraft in our atmosphere can’t zoom away at terrific speeds without generating a sonic boom.


77 posted on 06/16/2019 5:17:58 PM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob
Demons wouldn't need ships made of metal.

There is evidence that some UFOs are solid: Train Hits UFO

Rest assured that if a train hit any sort of aircraft that pieces of that aircraft would have been at the scene.

78 posted on 06/16/2019 5:44:11 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline
You haven't been following this story as reported by the Navy and former Naval pilots, have you? There is a mountain of radar, sonar, camera "evidence" plus visual confirmations by pilots.

BTW, the Navy and the Defense Department don't love to hear of sightings of UFO's and/or aliens.

Check out the articles at FR HERE

79 posted on 06/17/2019 2:14:37 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“You haven’t been following this story as reported by the Navy and former Naval pilots, have you?”

I just want to see a clear picture of one of these flying objects. I’ll stick with what I put in the earlier post.


80 posted on 06/17/2019 4:35:23 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson