Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Problematic Women: Women Are Increasingly Embracing Socialism … but Why?
The Daily Signal ^ | June 13, 2019 | Lauren Evans and Kelsey Bolar

Posted on 06/13/2019 6:44:25 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

In a recent poll for “Axios on HBO,” 55% of American women say they would prefer to live in a socialist country over a capitalist country. This week on “Problematic Women,” we discuss why women are embracing socialism and what can be done to stop this trend.

Also, we break down why freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says members of Congress, despite already making $174,000 a year, deserve a pay raise.

We crown Yale University graduate and future Justice Brett Kavanaugh law clerk Sophia Chua-Rubenfeld Problematic Woman of the Week.

And we discuss these topics:

— Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had surprisingly positive things to say about Kavanaugh’s first class of law clerks.

— Pro-life group Live Action was permanently banned from Pinterest this week for spreading “misinformation.”

— Mary Katharine Ham, CNN contributor and single mom of two, talks feminism, being a mother in the public eye, and much more.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; anotheraocthread; aoc; axios; berniesanders; bloggers; brettkavanaugh; capitalism; censorship; congress; crazywomen; denmark; fakenews; fakepolls; feminism; incometax; liveaction; marykatherineham; mothers; payraise; pinterest; problematicwomen; rbg; socialism; taxes; vat; welfare; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Here’s another question for you:

Why do women use makeup and perfume?


81 posted on 06/14/2019 5:27:06 AM PDT by utax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband.

Correct. Too many weak men.

82 posted on 06/14/2019 5:29:03 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (“Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

To: gaijin
"Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband."

Bingo. I might change 'better' to a safety net (in some cases), but the sentiment is exactly right IMO.

84 posted on 06/14/2019 6:45:33 AM PDT by HangThemHigh (Entropy is not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband.

Yup. The institution of marriage has broken down in this society to such a degree that they've gone shopping for a more reliable means of support.

This also preys on the tendency of women towards compassion. "Well gee, no one should go without food, or shelter, or medical care. Doing Socialism would just be NICER than what we have now."


85 posted on 06/14/2019 7:16:22 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HangThemHigh
"Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband."

In many cases no husband, as a lot of young men now consider Tinder and porn to be a preferable alternative to alimony and a lifetime of legal harassment.


86 posted on 06/14/2019 7:17:36 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

“:^)


87 posted on 06/14/2019 8:18:01 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

re: “If they are naturally more protective...why would they desire more outward security from someone else?”

They seek passivity from the environment; govt (well, dem politicos) promise just that.


88 posted on 06/14/2019 8:28:25 AM PDT by _Jim (Save babies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

“Because they consider Government as a better provider than a husband.”

They’ve been indoctrinated to believe that, for many decades now. And women just love how it tastes.

But, the fruit of their belief is bitter, indeed: broken marriages, lower (single) income ‘families’, fatherless children, feminized children, high illegitimacy rates, boys on mental drugs, harsh judgement$ against fathers, high youth and male suicide rates, fewer marriages, demasculization and demonization of boys and men. Bad stuff for a society.

I believe the vile seed was sown in 1919.


89 posted on 06/14/2019 8:37:45 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

“Liberal women: so stupid they make the rest of us look bad.”

More than just women who identify as liberal, imo.


90 posted on 06/14/2019 8:39:34 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: shanover

“They as a voting bloc will destroy the nation.”

They ARE destroying the nation. Look around, listen, observe.


91 posted on 06/14/2019 8:40:52 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

What did you think about the MSNBC and CNN bimbos going ga-ga over the creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti?


92 posted on 06/14/2019 8:41:55 AM PDT by GOPJ (Send Ebola illegals from Congo to Martha's Vineyard - let them kill liberals elites first...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Nah, you’re simply reading forbidden, uncomfortable truths that are rarely spoken publicly.

Just like saying “blacks are racist”.


93 posted on 06/14/2019 8:42:53 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ProudGRITS

Do you realize what your post actually demonstrates?


94 posted on 06/14/2019 8:45:33 AM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and how few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

I expect that kind of “stuff” out of the Leftists.

I’m concerned with middle class women and their ability to slide Left on some matters such as voting for Obama or some such.

Clinton would not have been president except for women, if I recall the numbers correctly.

It is concerning.


95 posted on 06/14/2019 8:46:30 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This space for rent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Women’s equality notwithstanding, too many of them feel that they have to be taken care of.


96 posted on 06/14/2019 9:04:05 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940
We should withhold sex from them until they come crawling back to capitalism.

Capitalism is producing all those sex robots the girls love.

97 posted on 06/14/2019 9:05:49 AM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Women, like the impoverished, have a compulsion and need to acquire resources while having less skill to do so then the more able-bodied and capable. This imo is one of the reasons women and non-property holders were not given the vote in the Constitution. They would use government to acquire what they can not earn.

The property holding requirement is just common sense. The Constitution is not written for the needy or foolish. If someone lacks the wisdom the acquire and hold property they lack the wisdom for deciding the country’s course.


98 posted on 06/14/2019 9:10:27 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Justa

There is NO requirement in the Constitution! Read it.

The STATES were to decide.

And guess what? Contrary to popular history, New Jersey allowed women voting in 1790 - long before WY. Problem was by 1820 or so it was abolished as some politician didn’t like losing because women didn’t like him. He managed to change it.

You’ve bought into the pop history of “property and white male”. That did not always hold and NEVER was in the Constitution!

BTW, thanks for all the veiled insults thrown in there against the people who BORE you. It’s a lot harder than sticking a stick in a hole.


99 posted on 06/14/2019 10:34:46 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Justa

One of the strangest posts......ever.


100 posted on 06/14/2019 10:40:45 AM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson