[LambSlave]

Oh, so accepting intel on compromising candidate behavior from a British spy would be illegal then, you’re saying?

[DoughtyOne]

“Oh, well no, I didn’t mean that. Oh my gosh no...”

Can’t believe she has to tell someone? That angle makes what she is saying highly suspect. She’s trying to set the premise anyone not agreeing is simply a dolt.

F U _itch!

[Tejas Rob]

>>Oh, so accepting intel on compromising candidate behavior from a British spy would be illegal then, you’re saying?<<

Yep, same as meeting with Ukrainian government officials to get dirt.

[redshawk]

Oh, so accepting intel on compromising candidate behavior from a British spy would be illegal then, you’re saying?

---

That’s exactly what she’s saying.
Trump played the rat party big time.

Pelosi said it was illegal
Schummer said it
Nader said it.
The FEC said it.

Now Barr can go after Clinton and the rat party cannot oppose it. Good job Mr Trump and thanks ABC Stephonopolis

[milagro]

Along with presenting that info as evidence to obtain a FISA warrant?