[x]

I suspect that he might be a bit more interested in knowing the truth of the story than most anyone.

Liddy certainly has an "interest" in the story behind Watergate.

But what's in his interest isn't necessarily the truth.

"Silent Coup" told him what he wanted to believe, so he believed it.

[Pelham]

“”Silent Coup” told him what he wanted to believe, so he believed it.”

How is that any different than what you do? Why is it that you are any less susceptible to confirmation bias than Liddy?

So tell us what you think happened instead of the Colodny hypothesis.