[Thommas]

Supporters believe they are a necessary legal defense against state and federal governments passing laws which infringe on their legal right to carry firearms.

It would appear that these local ordinances are in favor of the Second Amendment, and the supporters are trying to stem the tide of infringement.

[Twotone]

Yes, that’s the intent of the gun sanctuary movement. The author of this article is biased in the extreme. Virtually every person mentioned he attempts to smear. But I thought it was worth posting anyway.

[EagleUSA]

Yes, and it read two ways for me. Leaving anything to interpretation when it comes to the Constitution is NFG. That bothered me. I hope you are right....