Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

Legally who knows how this comes out. But it seems to me, there’s no harm in asking about citizenship. This question has been asked on census forms in the past.

I wonder why the liberals fear the citizenship question? Don’t they want to know how many non citizens are here?

There are many legal residents who are not citizens.


2 posted on 06/06/2019 3:17:14 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

I agree that the question should be on the form.

It’d be a hoot if in some districts it turned out there were more votes than citizens.


5 posted on 06/06/2019 3:26:45 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

If a state or district counts a million more bodies than actual citizens, the money flows based on bodies. Follow the money. Plus it might dispel their assertions that there are only a small amount of illegals in the country. Like hell. I’d put it 25 mil...which is 1/14th or 1/15th of the countries population.


12 posted on 06/06/2019 5:05:26 PM PDT by chiller (As Davey Crockett once said: Be sure you're right. Then go ahead. I'm goin' ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The fear that New York and California will lose a significant number of congresscritters if the census shows the population of citizens is lower than the actual number of representatives they have presently.

People like ‘Nadless could lose their fat seats to the Sandy Cortez of the party. Further that the proportion of representation of NYC is significantly less such that upstate and western NY might actually have a say in how the state is run.


13 posted on 06/06/2019 5:43:10 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I have pointed out that for the purpose of state legislative redistricting, it is required. Was it not this clause:

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; ...nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

that forced both houses of any state legislature to be apportioned on population? US House redistricting has a bit of wiggle room:

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed
14 posted on 06/06/2019 7:46:17 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson