Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trebb
Except the bump stock allowed weapons to fire at a extended rate they weren’t designed or built for...and the circumvention are even less accurate when spraying lead than the bump stock.

Oh, I agree 100%. Personally wouldn't own a bump stock (or a full auto) for that very reason. You are sacrificing accuracy for a higher rate of fire. That is usually a terrible trade off if you are a good or even average marksman (I suppose if you can't hit the broad side of a barn to begin with, the trade off might be worth it...the old spray and pray method). The only point I was making is that such bans are utterly pointless because there are multiple ways to circumvent them if you wish to use such a device (or just like flipping the Government the bird).

51 posted on 06/06/2019 3:34:05 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: apillar

Agree - While President trump only said he would “study” it, I tweeted to him that silencers were a bad bet to go after...they also serve a purpose in harmful sound reductions.


52 posted on 06/06/2019 4:54:51 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson