Particularly a non-starter like Gillibrand. At least they gave her the rope to hang herself with.
This silly woman is day dreaming. Without mincing words and dialogue, this gal, Democrat, Kristen Gillibrand is going nowhere...period. she is 100% burnt toast.
But, she has tons of like company...the twenty-three or twenty-four Democrat announced candidate for POTUS are all zeroes...period!!!
Fox News did not make up stories about infanticide.
3 orc legislature passed a bill too much cheering and applause, to allow abortion right up until the moment of birth.
And the governor of Virginia said the baby, once born, would be kept comfortable while they decide what to do with it.
I’m sure her attacks on Fox News will endear her to the Liberals. But the point is, Fox News did not improperly and maliciously introduce the subject of infanticide into the abortion debate. And maliciously introduced the subject of infanticide into the abortion debate. Her fellow Democrats are the ones who did it.
One real piece of semi-useful information from that interview...
The rats won’t put up a smoke screen of bulls-—+ about “judicial independence” or “politically neutral” for anyone they nominate to the court once they are able to do so again. They will claim that since DJT explicitly stated that pro-life was the only way he was going in nominations that somehow, this magically opened some kind of door that makes it OK for them “to change the rules”. In this fantasyland, dems ‘might’ have nominated a pro-life judge in the past (nope) or at some point in the future (yeah, right) if the bad orange man had not “changed the rules”.
No senator, DJT did not change the rules. He did what he has done since his campaign started; make honest statements about what he wants and how he wants to get it, without packaging it in a bunch of empty, deceitful words like the rest of DC. You see senator, we all “knew” that bathhouse Barry wouldn’t even speak with a judge that thought abortion was wrong or even that Roe v. Wade was crappy jurisprudence that could use some re-evaluation. He just lied to us about it, saying that we were getting the best possible judge when he put up the non-entity of the “wise latina” that has done nothing on the court but vote with the progressive judges.
Hypothetically, let’s say my wife is an awful cook (she’s not). Let’s further say that I am frequently told about my wife’s cooking expertise, assured that she is the finest cook possible, and that I will be getting fed gourmet meals regularly. What I actually get is never ending series of burned and awful messes for dinner, with none of them being actually GOOD to eat.
This creates for me two problems; the crappy cooking AND the bulls-—+. If she had told me every night “this is gonna awful dear, I’m sorry”, the bull-—+ is no longer an issue and the overall situation is now better. DJT is at least honest about about what he intends to cook for us.