Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rashida Tlaib Directs Mnuchin to Get an Attorney During Testy Hearing on Trump's Finances
Townhall.com ^ | May 22, 2019 | Cortney O'Brien

Posted on 05/22/2019 12:13:57 PM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: M Kehoe

The Dem leadership made their followers buy into the “Collusion” lie for so long, and eventually they seem to have even bought into it they must save face now that their precious Muller report didn’t have the desired facts they were pushing for 2 years.

Just like the claimed collusion, they are now claiming a cover up and trying to fish for facts to make it true.


61 posted on 05/22/2019 2:34:10 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Rashida Tlaib Directs Mnuchin to Get an Attorney During Testy Hearing on Trump's Finances

Partner, our Republican leaders need to start asking if these Congress critters have ever read our U.S. Constitution. The answer of course is they have never read the U.S. Constitution.

62 posted on 05/22/2019 2:40:23 PM PDT by TheConservativeTejano (God Bless Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Perhaps the Democrats have forgotten this little phrase in the Constitution:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Mueller could not find cause to indict Trump. So where is the probable cause for Congress to go after Trump's private financial papers?
63 posted on 05/22/2019 3:12:12 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Of course when these mental giants “think” there’s wrongdoing it must be so, thus the fishing expedition.


1) He’s a Billionaire, so they conclude he must have done something illegal.

2) It really doesn’t matter if they find evidence of illegal action...they are just looking for something they can confuse people into thinking might be illegal.


64 posted on 05/22/2019 3:27:59 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ObozoMustGo2012
These are my comments from an earlier thread:

Immediately after Pelosi's meeting about impeachment with the democRATS in the House this morning, this is word emerged as the new democRAT talking point about Trump.

Congressmen and media will follow her lead and start to use the "C" word....Coverup...regularly.

The new word of the day this week is "coverup" as in, "Trump is covering up. He's got something to hide. If he doesn't tell us what he and his administration are hiding, we may have no choice but to impeach him."

Trump has now said, no more legislation until they stop investigating him. This may backfire on the democRATS. It takes two to tango and with only one partner on the dance floor, the democRATS will look bad if they don't start doing their jobs of passing laws to help Americans instead of just trying to crucify Trump without his cooperation.

65 posted on 05/22/2019 3:58:16 PM PDT by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Gotta say...right, wrong, or just plain stupid, I have to admire the speed with which the dhimmicraps distribute their talking points memos...


66 posted on 05/22/2019 4:41:00 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

Also, before a zookeeper puts her in a cage, she ought to get a face transplant, too.

Honestly, I’ve seen better looking mugs on the rear end of a mule.


67 posted on 05/22/2019 8:26:06 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: vette6387; ExTexasRedhead; jazusamo

“There is simply no place in an open society for a “secret court” for any purpose.”

Especially when you consider that 96-98 percent of all FISA affidavits are approved. Consider also that FBI agent Colleen Rowley submitted a FISA affidavit to seize and exploit the contents of Zacarias Moussaoui’s (the so-called
19th hijacker; he wasn’t) emails, computer, etc. about a month prior to 9/11. The FBI General Counsel disapproved the affidavit, 9/11 occurred (obviously) and the GC got a $25,000 SES performance award in December 2001.

You just can’t make this shit up.


68 posted on 05/23/2019 4:57:14 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson