Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liar, Liar: Lynch Denied Instructing Comey To Downplay The Clinton Email Investigation
Townhall.com ^ | May 21, 2019 | Beth Bauman

Posted on 05/21/2019 4:51:17 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: Lockbox

[So who is lying, Ms. WeDiscussedGrandchildren&Golf or Mr. PantsOnFire?]

Both


41 posted on 05/21/2019 11:41:28 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
In a match of “Who’s going to prison, me or you” my money is on Lynch. She is far better versed at this then Comey. I wish her well in this matter. A striped Comey sounds good.

Comey's biggest weakness is his extremely high opinion of himself. Literally and figuratively, he looks down on everyone. He is always "the smartest person in the room". Of course he is wrong, he just can't see it. He's "too clever by half".

42 posted on 05/21/2019 12:09:33 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

43 posted on 05/21/2019 4:43:29 PM PDT by doug from upland (Why the hell isn't Hillary Rodham Clinton in prison yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


44 posted on 05/21/2019 4:49:19 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

she shouldn’t be reminding us of “Fulsom”.....

bwahahaha!!


45 posted on 05/21/2019 4:50:41 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Nice pun!!


46 posted on 05/21/2019 5:16:00 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
[Lynch: I did not. I have never instructed a witness as to what to say specifically. Never have, never will.]

Note the phrasing. Carefully-crafted.

Indeed. The first part answers the question she was asked.

[So you do not believe you ever instructed him to call it a matter?
Lynch: I did not.]
She could have ended her statement there but didn't.
The second part you noted...she wasn't speaking to the issue at hand.

What she really meant...IDK. But it sure is peculiar.

47 posted on 05/21/2019 5:24:31 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

What Lynch did was give a non-answer “answer” that will keep her from a perjury charge.

You can bet she told Comey to call it “a matter” and a whole lot more.

I hope Comey takes them both down.


48 posted on 05/21/2019 5:28:54 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I haven't read his book, so I can't say if that's in there or not.

The way she obsesses on making an issue of a direct quotation makes her sound very nervous.

49 posted on 05/21/2019 9:39:56 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
What Lynch did was give a non-answer “answer”...
On the contrary.
Her answer to the question was "I did not."
Period. Question answered.

The following statement was an unrelated self defense response.

50 posted on 05/22/2019 1:14:07 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
That is what we're seeing here: practiced criminals--Lynch, Clinton, Obama---
do not put criminal activity in writing....it's all verbal......so it can be denied.

Also....these were the heady days of "Anything Goes" when Hillary was a shoo-in.

51 posted on 05/22/2019 2:57:58 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

[I have never instructed a witness as to what to say specifically]

That’s her weasel statement immediately following.

Comey was not a “witness” when she told him “a matter”.

Comey didn’t become “a witness” until a long time later.

We may not agree. That’s OK. I don’t trust any of them.

Not at all.


52 posted on 05/22/2019 9:55:17 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lynch: I did not. I have never instructed a witness as to what to say specifically. Never have, never will.

Well now, you never instructed but just casually in passing mentioned it ?

“At the meeting, everyone agreed that Mr. Comey should not reveal details about the Clinton investigation. But Ms. Lynch told him to be even more circumspect: Do not even call it an investigation, she said, according to three people who attended the meeting. Call it a “matter.” “

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/04/23/nyt-former-ag-loretta-lynch-tried-to-play-down-the-true-nature-of-fbis-criminal-n2316975


53 posted on 05/22/2019 1:47:41 PM PDT by Rock N Jones (1935)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris; bitt; null and void; Liz
Comey was not a “witness” when she told him “a matter”.
I'm aware of that.

We may not agree.
We agree that what she said was 'off', I just don't believe her statement applied to Comey and that it applied to someone else.

Comey didn’t become “a witness” until a long time later.
An unconscious injection into the conversation, perhaps, or an attempt to divert the conversation in another direction.
It definitely deserves scrutiny.

I don’t trust any of them.
Nor do I knowing what we know now.

Lynch talks gun control, ISIS threat and Clinton email probe 'Fox News Sunday' Jun. 19, 2016
mark - 8:07
The investigation into the State Department email matter is going to be handled like any other matter.

She uses matter twice and she didn't correct Wallace when he used "criminal investigation" before her reply. She inserted the language into the conversation.
Needless to say IMO she is lying about the exchange between the two of them using her interview as the predicate for my opinion.

54 posted on 05/22/2019 2:19:42 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

[ Needless to say IMO she is lying about the exchange between the two of them ]

Yes


55 posted on 05/22/2019 2:22:24 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Lynch is lying.

Comey is lying.

Lynch and Comey both using weasel phrases to hide their coup attempt.

Now Lynch and Comey appear to contradict each other.

I predict they’ll cover for one another. If they can arrange an “accidental” tarmac meeting to work out the details.

If not, perhaps more popcorn is in order.


56 posted on 05/22/2019 2:26:21 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson