[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

So this judge supports confidential grand-jury information leaked to the public then, which is illegal and why Barr resisted the efforts of Jabba the Nadler.

[Charles Martel]

So this judge supports confidential grand-jury information leaked to the public then, which is illegal and why Barr resisted the efforts of Jabba the Nadler.

I guess is comes down to the specific portions of the report actually addressed by the ruling - if the grand jury witnesses for those redactions (if any) have agreed to the release of their testimony in this manner, I see no problem. If there are witnesses involved who've not agreed, then yes - an appellate judge needs to slam this ASAP.