Posted on 05/12/2019 4:43:43 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
May 12th, 2019
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Seth Moulton, D(eranged)-Mass., 2020 (who will never be president or the dem party nominee) presidential candidate; National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow; Howard Buffett (Brother of Warren, democrat lover), philanthropist and author of “Our 50 State Border Crisis.” The panel will be Whine Williams of Fox News, GOP pollster Kristen Soltis Anderson, Jonathan Swan of Axios, Millennial Coloring Book News and Josh Holmes, former chief of staff to Sen. Mitch McConnell.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Preempted by English League Premier Soccer (F. Chuck Todd sad).
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., House minority leader; Sen. Michael Bennet, D(elusional)-Colo., 2020 presidential candidate (who will never be president or the dem party nominee); Robert Gates, former secretary of defense for Bush AND Obama (geesh, pick a side!); Hank Paulson, former treasury secretary. The panel will be Susan Glasser, Commissar of The New Yorker and David Nakamura of The Amazon Bozos Post.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Rep. Adam Schitt, D(iminutiveTurd)-Calif.; Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.; Sen. Cory “I am Spartacus” Booker, D(espicable)-N.J., 2020 presidential candidate (who will never be president or the dem party nominee). The panel will be former Gov. Chris Christie, R-N.J.; Mayor Rahm Emanuel, D(espicable)-Chicago; Maggie Haberman, Chief Propagandist of The New York Slimes; and Seung Min Kim of The Amazon Bozos Post.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Sen. Kamala Hairass, D(isoriented)-Calif., 2020 presidential candidate (who will never be president or the dem party nominee). The panel will be Congressman Michael Waltz, R-Fla.; former Gov. Jennifer Granholm, D(isoriented)-Mich.; former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa.; and Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, former mayor of ruined Baltimore and former Disoriented democratic National Committee secretary.
SUNDAY MORNING FUTURES (FNC): en. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas; Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas; Jonathan Ward, author of “China’s Vision Of Victory” and founder of the Atlas Organization.
Bray, thank you so much for today’s essay. It is a pet topic of mine but even smart people have been brainwashed about forest management. My son is a brilliant guy but I could not talk to him about it. He just reacted.
It is so obvious to anyone who will listen.
I agree with everything but you forgot no-forehead Judge Nap.
Fox soars in the ratings but continues to put people on that everyone dislikes.
What are they thinking?
Maybe the most despicable guy on TV because he pretends to be neutral.
Did The soccer program get more people than Meet The Depress get?
Re #32 Kudlow is great...
The next Bobby Orr was Aborted by a leftist in 1998, the next Einstein was Aborted in 2007, the person who discover the cure for Cancer was Aborted in 2011 and this year, the person who discovered warp drive was Aborted...All murdered buy Liberals...
The best non-technical defense of President Trump's use of tariffs against China is a short article in "MarketWatch" by Martin Feldstein, Ronald Reagan's senior economic adviser:
"Trump and other U.S. officials think a tariff war with China can be won because China exports about four times more to the U.S. than the U.S. exports to China. The U.S. can therefore impose a much larger burden on Chinese exporters than the Chinese can impose on U.S. exporters. The Chinese economy is also much more dependent on exports than the U.S. economy is.
The tariffs are indeed a tax on American consumers and firms that use Chinese products in their production processes. But the increase in prices that Americans pay for Chinese imports and the resulting loss of real income are very small. Annual imports from China total about $500 billion. If the U.S. imposes a 25% across-the-board tariff, the rise in the cost to American buyers — assuming no change in the prices charged by Chinese exporters — would be $125 billion.
With U.S. national income exceeding $20 trillion, the increased cost would be a little more than 0.5% of total U.S. spending. And, because Chinese exporters would probably reduce the prices of some of their products, the increased cost to American buyers would be less than $125 billion. Moreover, American buyers would shift some of their purchases to products produced by U.S. firms or to imports from other countries, further lowering the net cost.
In short, the cost of the imposed tariffs is not large relative to the gain that would be achieved if the U.S. succeeds in persuading China to stop illegally taking U.S. firms’ technology.
Tariffs could be worth it if Chinese were forced to stop stealing U.S. technology
The Celtics...what a team...I don’t follow the NBA as much as I used to, but I still glance to see how the Celts are doing...Baseball and Hockey...
Thanks. Great article.
Well, I guess the answer then is to do nothing and just go kill ourselves.
Watch out for them Vancouver Island mountain lions, wolves, bears and above all sasquatches.
Lots of strange and different critters from our Southland!
And theres yer dad durn 211 Larry!
So your son is happy with the forests burning every summer and the way things are.
In Danbury CT, there was a minor league hockey team called the Danbury Trashers. It was owned by a Trash Company...
No. He almost suffered from one last year in Denver. He’s just been brainwashed and I’m not fighting with my only son over politics. I’m just not.
You don’t have to fight, just say you are tired of the forests burning and that they are dying. Something needs to be done for them
Hhmmm...we had some engineered floors put in this past December, to replace carpet. Turns out the wood was from China (well, engineered there) installer told us price was going up 40% about a month after we purchased.
But, I agree about the issues with China and our technology they steal/have stolen
Excellent just absolutely excellent
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.