Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yoe
This guy is compelling evidence that homosexuality is a serious personality disorder.

He ought to just buy himself a forehead and enjoy one of those stupid Budweiser LGBTQWERTY beers they're selling for "pride month."

15 posted on 05/09/2019 12:10:23 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Out on the road today I saw a Deadhead sticker on a Cadillac.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

True. It’s a mental illness. Living in the San Francisco area, I can tell you. Most of these LGBT folks are just demented. Folks like Nap who sorta fly below gaydar are among the worst.


19 posted on 05/09/2019 12:15:56 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Did he come out of the closet? Or was he outed. I wasn’t aware that he was a homosexual.


26 posted on 05/09/2019 12:18:27 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

According to Napalitano Barr “was asked by a member of the subcommittee if he knew anything about any criticisms by members of Mueller’s team about his four-page summary of Mueller’s conclusions. He replied, “No, I don’t.””
Actually what Barr was asked by Charlie Crist was as follows -
“Reports have emerged recently … that members of the special counsel’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter, that it does not adequately or accurately, necessarily, portray the report’s findings. Do you know what they’re referencing with that?”
Barr’s response was “No, I don’t. I think, I think, I suspect that they probably wanted, you know, more put out. “
The question asked about Barr’s knowledge of the “team”’s “frustration” with the summary not “adequately or accurately” portraying the report’s findings. But Barr believes his summary, while “limited”, did accurately portray the report’s findings. So when asked what these unnamed, second-hand comments were “referencing”, Barr said he didn’t “know”, and said what he suspected. If someone says they are frustrated because I am late for an appointment, but in fact I am on time for the appointment, I would say I don’t “know” what is making them frustrated, because their frustration has no basis in fact - even though they they have stated exactly what they are frustrated by in their imaginary world.
Napalitano says the question was whether Barr knew “anything” about the criticism of the 4 page report. In fact the question was whether he knew what caused the “team members” to to feel the report was not “accurate”. The report was accurate, so Judge Napalitano is a liar, just like Mazie Hirono, Pelosi, Nadler, and their ilk.


38 posted on 05/09/2019 12:43:08 PM PDT by brookwood (Obama said you could keep your plan - now says higher taxes will improve the weather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson