So, having read the original Frontpage editorial by Milo, I can confidently say that this article’s title is histrionic. In no way does the original article rise to the threshold of blood libel, much less anti-Semitism.
There are plenty of things to criticize Milo on (his obstinacy with regards to the sin of Sodom, for one), but as far as this instance goes, anti-Semitism isn’t one of them.
I think Milo's comments followed his typical pattern of wandering off into loose, light-minded non-sequiturs. These serve no grand theory, whether high or low; he apparently scatters them about because they attracted him interest for a moment, or because he likes to ding people in order to keep up his bona-fides as an Equal Opportunity Offender.
So, yeah. Much ado over very little.