Posted on 05/03/2019 3:23:03 PM PDT by jazusamo
Top Aide Admits That Clinton Used Personal Email for Official Business
What Were Anti-Trump Conspirators Strzok and Ohr Saying to Each Other?
Were Suing Over Federal Purchases of Human Abortion Tissue
Bruce Ohr Email Raises Possible Ethics Concerns Tied to Russia Testimony
Whats the Deal on Andrew Weissmanns Meeting with AP Reporters?
Were Helping a Watchdog Group Get Information on DCs Transit System
Top Aide Admits That Clinton Used Personal Email for Official Business
Jacob Jake Sullivan, Hillary Clintons senior advisor and deputy chief of staff when she was secretary of state, has now answered our questions under oath.
We have released the transcript of this court-ordered deposition in which he admits that both he and Clinton used her unsecure non-government email system to conduct official State Department business. A full transcript of the deposition is available here .
Our court-ordered discovery centered upon whether Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a non-government email system and whether the State Department adequately searched for records responsive to our FOIA request.
In the questioning, Sullivan admitted that he had used his personal Gmail account at times for State Department business but denied that he had sent classified information to Secretary Clintons unsecured personal system.
After we pointed out that on January 26, 2010, Sullivan sent a classified email with the subject line call sheet , Sullivan testified: When I sent this email, my best judgment was that none of the material in it was classified, and I felt comfortable sending the email on an unclassified system. The material has subsequently been upclassified but at the time that I sent it, I did not believe that it was classified.
Sullivan said in the deposition that he had not been concerned about Clintons use of a non-government email account, because it was not part of his job:
Like Secretary Clinton has said herself, I wish she had used a State Department account. It wasnt really part of my job to be thinking about Secretary Clintons emails so I dont think I sort of fell down directly in my job, but do I wish I had thought of it during the time we were at State. Of course. I mean, what human being at this point wouldnt have thought of that?
Sullivans deposition is part of United States District Judge Royce C. Lamberths order for senior officials including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Jacob Sullivan, and FBI official E.W. Priestap to respond under oath to our questions.
A video of the Sullivan deposition exists but is under seal after the Justice Department and State Department, which opposed any discovery, objected to their public release. The court denied release of the video depositions for now and left the door open for reconsideration.
[T]he Court does not foreclose future releases of audiovisual recordings in this or other cases. Judicial Watch may move to unseal portions of these recordings relied upon in future court filings. So too may it use the video recordings at trial, consistent with the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Judge Lamberth made the ruling in our July 2014 FOIA lawsuit filed after the U.S. Department of State failed to respond to a May 13, 2014 FOIA request ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)). We are seeking:
Copies of any updates and/or talking points given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency concerning, regarding, or related to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Any and all records or communications concerning, regarding, or relating to talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack given to Ambassador Rice by the White House or any federal agency.
What this means is that a federal court wants answers on the Clinton email scandal, and Sullivan is just one of many witnesses we will question under oath. It is shameful that the Justice and State Departments continue to try to protect Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration on the email scandal.
You will recall that U.S District Court Judge Royce Lamberth ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides, as well as E.W. Priestap, to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.
Previously we released interrogatory responses given under oath by E.W. (Bill) Priestap , assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, in which he stated that agency found Clinton email records in the Obama White House, specifically, the Executive Office of the President.
What Were Anti-Trump Conspirators Strzok and Ohr Saying to Each Other?
We have filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Justice for communications between two of the pivotal players in the Deep State, anti-Trump collusion former FBI official Peter Strzok and Justice Department official Bruce Ohr ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:19-cv-01082)).
We sued after submitting two similar July 20, 2018, FOIA requests to Justice and the FBI. The FBI failed to respond, while the Justice Department claimed to find no records of communications between Strzok and Ohr. The lawsuit seeks:
All records of communication between FBI official Peter Strzok and Bruce Ohr, in either his role as Associate Deputy Attorney General or Director of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force, including but not limited to emails (whether on .gov or non-.gov email accounts, and whether using their real names or aliases), text messages, encrypted app messages and/or instant chats.
The time frame for the requested records is January 2016 to July 20, 2018.
We are challenging the Justice Departments extraordinary claim that there are no records of communications between Strzok and Ohr in light of the preeminent role both individuals played in the Deep State effort to undermine the Trump campaign and administration. In addition, Ohr himself testified before Congress that he did, in fact, meet and communicate with Strzok.
On April 25, Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) submitted a letter to Attorney General William Barr about text messages from Strzok to former FBI lawyer Lisa Page that may show potential attempts by the FBI to conduct surveillance of President-elect Trumps transition team.
We know that Peter Strzok was deeply involved in both running the Hillary server investigation cover-up by the FBI and in creating the counterintelligence investigation of false claims of Trump-Russian collusion. Its doubtful that Ohrs meetings with Strzok over a matter of national importance happened without a scrap of communication. Its past time the Justice Department begins acting in good faith, stops the game playing, abides by the law and produces the documents.
Were Suing Over Federal Purchases of Human Abortion Tissue
The FDA is using your tax dollars to purchase fetal tissue sold by abortion clinics, and we are investigating.
We have filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) seeking Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents about the purchase and use of human fetal tissue obtained from abortion clinics that was used by FDA researchers in humanized mice testing.
We sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department Health and Human Services (No. 1:19-cv-00876)) after HHS failed to respond adequately to a September 28, 2018, FOIA request for:
Heres whats going on. On July 25, 2018, the FDA signed a contract to acquire human fetal tissue to transplant into humanized mice so that the mice would have a human immune system.
The Trump administration in September 2018 halted the FDAs contract with Advanced Biosciences Resources, which sold fetal tissue it obtained from abortion clinics to the FDA for use in animal testing. Additionally, HHS said in a statement on September 24, 2018, that it was conducting an audit of all acquisitions involving human fetal tissue to ensure conformity with procurement and human fetal tissue research laws and regulations.
Members of Congress, in a September 17, 2018, letter to FDA Commission Scott Gottlieb, raised concern over the FDAs signing on July 25, 2018, of a $15,900 contract with ABR. It was the eighth contract between FDA and ABR since 2012.
In the letter, the Congress members noted that separate 2016 investigations by the House Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives and the Senate Judiciary Committee found that ABR paid abortion clinics $60 per single aborted fetus and sold the body parts to researchers at fees of $325 per specimen (brain, eyes, liver, thymus and lungs).
Why are U.S. taxpayer dollars being used to contract with a company alleged to have trafficked in baby body parts? We are demanding a full accounting of the procedures as well as the funds used in this disturbing experimentation.
Bruce Ohr Email Raises Possible Ethics Concerns Tied to Russia Testimony
Off the Wall Ping!
Contact to be added.
Sorry. Listening to The Who Quadrophenia. Back in a moment.
“Fitton to the left of them, Barr to the right of them, Trump in front of them volleyed and thundered, stormed at with shot and shell..”
Sorry Tom. You’re out.
You’re not a war time consigliere, but Barr is.
Good thing all of what democrats do is for the children or else children would be dead in the millions .... ah (senility)
Not only that, but she committed serious security violations by transmitting highly classified material via her home unsecure email. This is serious security violation.
Are you serious?? Tom Fitton has been FABULOUS!! Way better that the “Just Us” Dept! Good freaking grief! Send him some money!
Support Free Republic, Folks! Donate today!
Where is her official government secure computer that she was supposed to be using to get all the classified materials? What’s on it?
I’d bet someone else is using it at State, it was probably untouched when she left. :)
But of course. She’s not one of ‘the little people’ that any laws apply to.
SecState was the name of email used to send emails department wide. If you clicked on SecState it revealed HRC@Clintonmail.com as the underlying email address. I reported this to IRM and DS while working at State. This evening I sent an email to Judical Watch information them that they could request a FOIA of my former work email to confirm.
Thanks for relating that, Jumper!
That alone speaks volumes about Hillary’s arrogance and ego, she was and is used to doing anything she desires because of her name whether legal or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.