you're kidding, right? did you read what you just wrote???If she traded it, then she didn’t own it when the Nazis confiscated it.
Traded it for her life???????????????????????????????????
...a Nazi official forced her to surrender the painting in exchange for the exit visa...
Translation: the Nazis stole it.End of story.Finding for the plaintiff! Next case!
[[As she tried to leave Germany, a Nazi official forced her to surrender the painting in exchange for the exit visa she needed.]]
In otherwords- she was FORCED to trade it- in other words- the Nazis stole it- the granting of exit visa played no part- she was forced into this- it was stolen
Coercion voids a contract. But I’m sure the Nazis appreciate your support
She “traded” it for an exit visa. Don’t be fooled, it was confiscated.
That’s not a trade.
It’s extortion, made legal by the Nazis.
We obliterated each and every Nazi law after Germany surrendered.
Except extortion?
Hmmmmmmm....
except you have ‘traded’ and ‘confiscated’ in the same sentence. It’s hardly a ‘trade’ when it’s at the point of a gun. That’s like saying a carjacker traded your car for your life so it’s not your car.
A deal made under duress has no legal weight.
you're kidding, right? did you read what you just wrote???