Checkmate. How President Trump’s legal team outfoxed Mueller

Human Events ^ | May 1, 2019 | Will Chamberlain

[PrairieLady2]

Think stealth bombers and decoys.

[Kay]

Thank you very much for your Twitter account postings. Informative, savvy, and comprehensive .

Politics is not my forte, thus, your savvy postings are helpful to me.

Thanks again.

[Trump_Triumphant]

Sessions looks like Frank Perdue on a good day.

[Jeff Chandler]

Sessions is either very stupid, or very treacherous.

Third option: Coward, i.e.: Republican.

[faithhopecharity]

yes, i have been so advised by some here on FR

i disagreed, I felt Trump could have just gone on TV and explained why he was firing them ... DT has a great TV presence and I am confident the American people would have understood and supported him

but,... what do I know?
ha!
it was his call.. each and every day for 2 years .. and each day he kept Mueller on the payroll

so what’s done is done, and I do understand your POV, thanks

[bagster]

Pretty much blows Q/Sessions “secret sting” out of the water.

Believe it or not, LS, the "secret sting" theory that I THINK you're talking about is not a Q thing.

It may have been discussed by some Q aficionados as a possible interpretation of Q, but it was not a fully accepted one. I know this because I'm involved in the conversation and I never bought into the Mueller/[RR] "white hat/secret sting" theory and know that Q NEVER said anything like that.

So, to make a comment like you just did, attributing some kind of "secret sting" to Q, is false.

But because SOME Q researchers buy into that theory, people like you and the derp media use that fact point to discredit" Q.

Aren't you better than that? Before making judgements you should know of which you speak.

I really like your attitude, LS, and know that your heart is in the right place. But knowing how wrong you are when you make statements like this makes me lose respect for your thoroughness.

It's like, if you are careless with your thoughts and theories as you are here, what else are you careless and thoughtless about.

Ya dig?

[bagster]

Mueller and/or some of his team WANTED Trump to fire them.

Absolutely. To the derps, Mueller was a win/win proposition. Omn the one hand, he acted as a [BLOCKADE], protecting the derps from repercussions for their dirty and illegal deeds, and acting as an "evidence sponge" where all evidence went to die.

He was the precursor for either indictments, but more importantly impeachment. As well as shaping public opinion against Trump and fodder for the mid-term and 2020 election.

He was the instrument of the derp's INSURANCE POLICY.

Now, the fact that Mueller is done and gone should tell us that the Trump PLAN has been and is effective. Mueller was supposed to go on at least up until the 2020 election, but now it's over and all the derps have left is the House investigations, which DECLAS and the IG should finish off.

Firing Mueller would have been an acceptable and maybe even a preferable outcome for the derps. It would have been used to PROVE obstruction and be used as the vehicle for impeachment. The derps practically begged The Donald to do it. Same with [RR].

They called the firing of Mueller, [RR], and even sometimes Sessions a RED LINE that they warned Trump not to cross.

Just in case some people were wondering about the "optics" and politics of all this.

[humblegunner]

But because SOME Q researchers buy into that theory, people like
you and the derp media use that fact point to discredit" Q.

So if Sri Chaitanya of Bengal (1486-1533), founder of Hare
Krishna never actually said that they should hang around
airports ringin' bells and annoying people... then that
means they aren't really officially doing so?

Since brer Chaitanya isn't around to say otherwise and we
must depend upon the interpretation of his "drops" by the
faithful and them faithfuls are dancin' around in airports
then we must conclude that this behavior is in line with
the "drops" of Chaitanya.

I'd really rather have used the Moonies for this, since Moonie
is 'way funnier than Hare Krishna but them Moonies seem a pretty
dull lot. I'll work 'em in somewhere down the line.

[bagster]

we must depend upon the interpretation of his "drops" by the faithful

And here is the fatal flaw in your analogy.

No, we musn't depend on the interpretation of the "faithful".

He who does that has a fool for a client.

You're easy, HG.

Also, I agree. Moonies are way funnier than Hare Krsnas.

#JaiSriRade

[humblegunner]

No, we musn't depend on the interpretation of the "faithful".

Then what are y'all doing on them Q threads if not faithfully interpreting?

Just moonin' around?

(Carl, having been assigned "roady" duty pushing the dolly
with the amp, soon lost faith in the movement and is now living
happily in Kansas City and owns a successful Ace Hardware franchise.)

[bagster]

Then what are y'all doing on them Q threads if not faithfully interpreting?

You said "depend" on the interpretation of the faithful.

What are we doing on them Q threads?

We discuss, argue, and present ideas to each other, while LOOKING AT the interpretations of others.

Then each and every INDIVIDUAL, thinking for himself, comes up with their own personal "interpretation" based on a preponderance of the evidence and which is subject to change pending further information.

We call it "thinking for ourselves".

Anybody that DEPENDS on the interpretations of others is a useless sheep. That holds true for Moonies, Krsnas, and even Christians if you ask me. Why depend on the interpretation of "priests" when you can go straight to the source?

Have you noticed the rift between #TeamWhiteHat and #TeanBlackHat? That argument has been going on for a while now, and is pretty entertaining. I claim #TeamBlackHat status myself.

And we are able to discuss different interpretations and remain civil. Time will prove all things (future proves past). This is nothing like religion.

And you know this.

[humblegunner]

Then each and every INDIVIDUAL, thinking for himself,
comes up with their own personal "interpretation" based
on a preponderance of the evidence and which is subject
to change pending further information.

That sounds like a puzzle that has no solution.
How can anyone ever be sure they got it right?
That would frustrate me and drive me to drink.

their own personal "interpretation"

What if that interpretation is that it's a load of bunk?
They get tossed off the island to get ate up by sharks?

Have you noticed the rift between #TeamWhiteHat and #TeanBlackHat?

Yep. Needs more fights if you axe me.

And we are able to discuss different interpretations and remain civil.

Needs more fights if you axe me.

And you know this.

I'll never tell.
I take my role as stereotypical denier very seriously and dislike slipping out of character.

[bagster]

What if that interpretation is that it's a load of bunk? They get tossed off the island to get ate up by sharks?

Kindly mockery usually works, unless they cross the line into kookoo-ville. Remember Smoky? Most people have a sense of shame.

Yep. Needs more fights if you axe me.

Oh, we have enough fights. Enough to keep me entertained, anyway. And if things get too peaceful for too long, a troll or two will saunter in to disturb the hive.

I'll never tell. I take my role as stereotypical denier very seriously and dislike slipping out of character.

Luckily, I have taken my PHD at the University of Life and not only understand Q's comms, but my fellow man.

You are known to me, Humblegunner.

And I approve. Can't fool the Bagster.

[WashingtonSource]

Great analysis

[LS]

Well, those “afficionados” are the leading Qsters on twitter, although they don’t specifically call themselves that out of (I think) concern for what’s left of their reputations.

Aren’t you better than that? Surely you read these people.

If you are careless with this kind of defense of Q, how careless are you with other facts?

[LS]

Speaking of facts, you do know that there has not been one single new bed added in Gitmo, that not ONE new prisoner has been taken there in a couple of years, that the only facility expansion is a judge-mandated lawyer/client conference area, and that all this has been reported both by the Miami Herald reporter on the scene and by a source I have who is in charge of vetting EVERY new arrival?

Contra Q.

[bagster]

Well, those “afficionados” are the leading Qsters on twitter,

So? That don't make their opinion any better than mine.

Not everybody is impressed by "twitter fame" or "book writing".

concern for what’s left of their reputations.

This is a syndrome you are very familiar with and I assume is the main reason you don't avail yourself of Trump's Q op and the treasure trove of information to be had there. That and pride.

Aren’t you better than that?

I'm better than most things, yes.

Surely you read these people.

Now and again. I don't "follow" any of them, but even with them, there is truth to be found at times. Just like there is some truth to be found in your thoughts, LS. At times.

I pick and choose.

If you are careless with this kind of defense of Q, how careless are you with other facts?

And what carelessness would that be? Not relying on "twitter guys'" opinions to form my own?

I call that good.

[bagster]

Speaking of facts, you do know that there has not been one single new bed added in Gitmo,

So? What's your point.

I'm not a huge fan of the "Gitmo" thing.

Possible? Yes.

Trump's plan? Maybe. Maybe not.

[a little elbow grease]

________________

After justice finally is served and the evil sleazebags are sent to the darkness ......

..... may we live in peace, and to live not as a hound nor a hare.

[a little elbow grease]

I see others over-talk their guests as well. I see the guests do it too.-----

_____________

Neil Cavuto also interrupts his guests, even female guest so much I'd like to see him GONE!

On Tuesday I saw him interrupt a woman about eight times in a row in a short couple of minutes. He is a bum. And that foul gravely voice just adds to the charm.