Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

The private server setup itself was all the “intent” any “reasonable prosecutor” would have needed to indict


9 posted on 05/01/2019 5:42:18 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: digger48
The private server setup itself was all the “intent” any “reasonable prosecutor” would have needed to indict

Yes. This, exactly.

I've been saying this for years. This server was never set up for "convenience," or whatever other reason Clinton gave as an explanation. One can only conclude that the presence of the server was to prevent certain communications from her from being archived or retrieved as government records. This alone, sans any other evidence, should've been enough to indict.

What concerns me is that under Obama's "Justice" department, any evidence remaining on that server has long since been destroyed, and that wouldn't be enough to convict her.

35 posted on 05/02/2019 7:10:58 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson