Judicial Watch: Top Hillary Clinton Aide Admits Under Oath that He and Clinton Used Unsecure...

Judicial Watch ^ | May 1, 2019 | Tom Fitton

[Secret Agent Man]

Yup

[Lurkinanloomin]

Unfortunately Judicial Watch can’t prosecute anyone.

[Secret Agent Man]

Yup

[HarleyLady27]

...next week, with a red scarf in a motel room...

[wastedyears]

Well, this guy won’t live very long.

[Jet Jaguar]

More icing on the cake.

[Bonemaker]

"Judicial Watch: Top Hillary Clinton Aide Admits Under Oath that He and Clinton Used Unsecure Personal Email for Official State Department Business "

[Bommer]

It’s Judicial Watch...the Trey Gowdy of all talk, no do.

[bitt]

p

[laplata]

Thanks.

[Jumper]

BS - I reported Hillary’s HRC22@Clintonmail.Com to Diplomatic Security and was basically blacklisted, given a verbal reprimand by my ambassador (who told me I couldn’t tell him why he was reprimanding me).

[Auntie Mame]

Wow. Thank you for upholding your oath, even if nobody else does.

[rolling_stone]

did he have to sign an acknowledgement of the law and his responsibility like clinton was supposed to have done?

[Trump_Triumphant]

I heard he was very helpful in choosing some of the party favors for Chelsea’s wedding.

[Lou L]

The private server setup itself was all the “intent” any “reasonable prosecutor” would have needed to indict

Yes. This, exactly.

I've been saying this for years. This server was never set up for "convenience," or whatever other reason Clinton gave as an explanation. One can only conclude that the presence of the server was to prevent certain communications from her from being archived or retrieved as government records. This alone, sans any other evidence, should've been enough to indict.

What concerns me is that under Obama's "Justice" department, any evidence remaining on that server has long since been destroyed, and that wouldn't be enough to convict her.

[lepton]

Everyone who has security clearances gets it clearly spelled out multiple times what is allowed and what isn’t. They give people examples to explain why something is or isnt permitted.

---

And it is not complicated. It is a system designed for 18-year-old kids off the street to execute properly.

[monocle]

The DOJ dust off Hillary’s file and decide to indict and try her. Some people may question whether double jeopardy would come into play and the answer is unequivocally NO.