Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SpaceX’s Unnerving Silence on an Explosive Incident
The Atlantic ^ | 4/30/19 | MARINA KOREN

Posted on 04/30/2019 2:05:56 PM PDT by Yossarian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: BitWielder1
Isn't it possible that the rescue rockets weren't even fueled up on the unmanned trip to the ISS, hence the ISS was in no danger from that at least.

The escape-system SuperDraco engines and the maneuvering thruster Draco engines share the same fuel source. To use the SuperDracos for escape use, it's possible the fuel system is "driven" in a different way, possibly pumped up to high pressure so they can immediately fire with high thrust. But they share the same fuel tanks.

21 posted on 04/30/2019 3:08:02 PM PDT by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
I don't know. Like I said, I haven't been following the story.

-PJ

22 posted on 04/30/2019 3:08:06 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

I’m pretty sure the abort system on this capsule uses the same propellants as its control trusters and control trusters on the ISS.


23 posted on 04/30/2019 3:15:53 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


24 posted on 04/30/2019 3:28:11 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (BUTTGIGGITY ! It's an anal thing. You wouldn't understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

The Dracos have a perfect safety record, and, in general, hypergolics have decades of use in spaceflight. They are extremely stable when they are are in the tanks.

Fuel tank sizes, locations, and pressures may also make Dracos safer than Superdracos.


25 posted on 04/30/2019 3:29:44 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
This is a used capsule which has been immersed in sea water. Human crew DO NOT fly in used capsules.
Spacex has been more than transparent in all stages of their program.
As soon as they have something to report, you will hear about it.
26 posted on 04/30/2019 4:25:22 PM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

ChiCom sabotage.


27 posted on 04/30/2019 4:38:53 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
No, disagree. Not when it is done for a taxpayer-funded program

So anytime our behemoth federal government touches anything, it automatically becomes a public concern, and must require transparency far greater than government ever provides? Sorry, no.

28 posted on 04/30/2019 7:42:43 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
So anytime our behemoth federal government touches anything, it automatically becomes a public concern, and must require transparency far greater than government ever provides? Sorry, no.

Good God, do you people ever look at context?!?!

Crewed Dragon Capsule visits hyper-expensive, human carrying International Space Station.

Soon after, during a ground test, for some yet unknown and/or unpublished reason, said capsule goes BOOM!, obliterating the entire capsule.

Crewed Dragon Capsule shares many systems with Cargo Dragon Capsule.

Cargo Dragon Capsule is about to revisit the hyper-expensive, human carrying International Space Station.

To not think some transparency and common-sense precaution is required in this situation is delusional.

29 posted on 04/30/2019 7:51:17 PM PDT by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Thanks fieldmarshaldj. Since they don't need the superdracos for propulsive landing any longer (NASA nixed that), they should consider slapping on a tower jet which is a proven way to safely abort. And I don't believe it ever had to be used. And it certainly didn't blow up for no apparent reason.

30 posted on 04/30/2019 11:17:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson