A treaty that isn’t ratified means nothing.
Really?
Gee, and here I thought we were still in the League of Nations.
Boy howdy...ya learns all kinda stuff from FReepers!
“A treaty that isnt ratified means nothing”.
In 1992 the after their Earth Summit in Rio the U.N. sent up to the U.S. Senate the “Agenda 21” Treaty: “The Convention on Biological Diversity”.
Our Senate was at the point of Cloture when Dr. Michael Coffman exposed to the Senate Majority Leader the Implementing Protocols which the U.N said had not been written. Also he exposed that it ordered implementation of “The Wildlands Project” - 50% of the American off limits to humans. These maps were shown on the Floor of the Senate causing the vote to be tabled thus this Treaty has NEVER been ratified.
Promptly after this minor setback Clinton issued EO 12852 which ordered a hand picked committee of Comrads to find ways to implement the Agenda 21 policies in the un-ratified treaty into U.S. domestic policy. EO 12852 was followed by several more by Clinton and Obama. In effect, these unlawful EO’s ratified a UN Treaty which our Senate has refused to even vote on.
These EO’s are still in effect.
So, if you think a treaty that is never ratified means nothing. Think again.