Skip to comments.
During NRA speech, Trump drops out of another global arms treaty
Washington Post ^
| Apr. 26, 2019
| Missy Ryan and John Hudson
Posted on 04/26/2019 11:17:14 AM PDT by Innovative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Excellent! That's our president. Putting US interests first.
To: Innovative
It was never ratified. Obama knew it wouldn’t be ratified, but signed anyway.
Although this will be portrayed by the MSM as Trump’s arbitrary decision, the over-reach was Obama’s. Here, and with the Paris Accord as well.
2
posted on
04/26/2019 11:19:44 AM PDT
by
Pearls Before Swine
( "It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")
To: Innovative
Liberals will be going ballistic!.................................More than usual.................
3
posted on
04/26/2019 11:19:59 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
To: Innovative
Move in the right direction but to be honest I am more concerned about the Dems constant effort to take away our 2nd Amendment rights.
4
posted on
04/26/2019 11:22:30 AM PDT
by
taxcontrol
(Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
To: Innovative
The Arms Trade Treaty was the UN’s encroachment into our nation’s sovereignty. The Globalists lose, America wins.
5
posted on
04/26/2019 11:23:31 AM PDT
by
jonrick46
(Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
To: Innovative
Bur,...But.... wtf bout our image worldsugar daddy....???????????????????
6
posted on
04/26/2019 11:23:37 AM PDT
by
gunnyg
("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
To: Innovative
"...his aversion to international pacts and world governance." Best election, best POTUS, evah!
7
posted on
04/26/2019 11:23:43 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: Innovative
Excellent!
You want to bow to the World Government, Congress needs to put their head on the chopping block and vote for it.
8
posted on
04/26/2019 11:23:46 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: Innovative
Think Ill go to gun range this weekend
9
posted on
04/26/2019 11:24:21 AM PDT
by
Spruce
To: Innovative
Great! Now that means we won’t have to shoot at blue helmets anytime soon.
10
posted on
04/26/2019 11:24:36 AM PDT
by
Chainmail
(A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
To: Innovative
Obama signed it ....sure nuff.
Congress did not ratify it.
Trump said....What the hell are you doing. We do not have an International Constitution.
To: Innovative
Not valid anyway (since it was never ratified) so it is not binding. Trump is still 0/1 on gun issues. He banned bumpstocks but hasn’t done anything on the plus gun side.
To: Innovative
HK can be imported again to the USA?
:-)
13
posted on
04/26/2019 11:30:37 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: mad_as_he$$
your kidding right?
forgetting about judges ?
forgetting about NRA appearances ?
14
posted on
04/26/2019 11:31:36 AM PDT
by
aumrl
(let's keep it real Conservatives)
To: taxcontrol
Move in the right direction but to be honest I am more concerned about the Dems constant effort to take away our 2nd Amendment rights. This treaty gave the UN the right to do that....which is why the head RAT (Zero) signed it. That way the RATs could say, "It's not us doing this. It's the UN"
15
posted on
04/26/2019 11:32:17 AM PDT
by
Roccus
(When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
To: taxcontrol
not just their constant effort to take away gun rights, but also their deep desire to give away our sovereignty to foreign nations
16
posted on
04/26/2019 11:32:51 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: Innovative
Entangling treaties are one way constitutional rights can be damaged or taken away.
17
posted on
04/26/2019 11:34:11 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: taxcontrol
Yeah it was clear he said ‘no foreigners’ would ever take away our 2a rights. That of course doesn’t mean domestic enemies won’t stop trying.
But given his context was about getting out of a bad foreign treaty, his point is great and its good we are out of that mess.
18
posted on
04/26/2019 11:35:41 AM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Innovative
Not ratified = the US is not a party to the treaty and could not “pull out” because it was never in
19
posted on
04/26/2019 11:38:18 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(The Clinton Coup attempt was a worse attack on the USA than was 9/11)
To: Innovative
Negotiated by W, signed by Obama in 2013 but never ratified in the past six years? Ditch it.
20
posted on
04/26/2019 11:39:20 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Fake news lies, credibility dies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson