Consider the Geller Report. What its French investigators have reported so far leads to other very real possibilities.
Posted on 04/20/2019 5:51:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Following the horrifying fire that badly damaged one of the world’s great treasures, the mainstream media is pushing the storyline that the fire that ravaged the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris was caused by an “electrical short circuit.” But the story in the Daily Mail lacks any evidence to back up that claim.
A French judicial police official said investigators brought in to work out the cause of the inferno made the claims -- despite them not having been given access to the church yet for safety reasons. The official, who spoke anonymously about the ongoing investigation, said the monument is still being consolidated with wooden planks to support some fragile parts of the walls. Only after it is fully made safe will investigators will be allowed a closer look in order to accurately determine the cause of the fire… .Only after (the Cathedral) is fully made safe will investigators will be allowed a closer look in order to accurately determine the cause of the fire.
Did you get that? “Investigators” brought in to determine the cause of the tragic blaze have not yet been given access to the burned-out cathedral. Nevertheless they are already announcing the results of their investigation. Even as the embers were still glowing on the day of the fire, French prosecutors were ruling out arson. On what evidence were they able to make that judgment?
Consider the Geller Report. What its French investigators have reported so far leads to other very real possibilities.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Video of Unidentified Man on Notre Dame’s Bell Towers 30 Minutes After Fire Starts
A French judicial police official said investigators brought in to work out the cause of the inferno made the claims
Names?
In earlier reports, the lack of fire suppression was said to be due to the reluctance to add wiring to the roof area. The report specifically said they did not want wires there due to the fire risk.
They'd rather die in their cowardice.
On what evidence were they able to make that judgment?
No catastrophic insurance coverage and no deaths (that we know of), so no serious investigation will take place.
Ridiculous. A sprinkler system requires no wires what so ever.
With no hard at or yellow vest, the man was nota construction worler.
He looks Immamish to me
A radical immam burned the cathedral
The Hunchback’s cat knocked over a candle....same level of incredulity.
The garb of that ‘mysterious person’ reminds me of something...
The partisan media now must reap what it has sown. Mistrust is now so ingrained that that lies and subterfuge are now presumed. We live in a modern dark age of truth.
Mosques seem to have amazing wiring:
NEVER any short-circuits there, nope.
This just in: French authorities blame next week’s church fire on a clogged chimney.
Of interest in light of our recent discussion.
They can be, however, relatively heavy.
These cathedrals were built to be tall and let in light and to do that they had to be as lightly built as the builders thought they could get away with. Essentially they represent a delicate balance between standing up and falling down, with those that were too lightly built having suffered collapses long ago.
Thing is, the builders did their thing through art and experience, not endless engineering calculations. So people today don’t necessarily know how much weight they could add before just right becomes too light.
The authorities won’t allow it.
With a fire that hot, investigators will only be able to detect chemical traces. There won’t be any wires to examine and it is doubtful that the renovation work depended on computers operating sensors on site.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.