Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Twotone

[A man who refused to open his door to let police enter his home without a warrant should not have been convicted for obstruction of justice, the lead opinion for the Washington Supreme Court concluded on Thursday. “Criminalizing the refusal to open one’s own door to a warrantless entry would be enormously chilling and inconsistent with our deeply held constitutional values,” Justice Steven Gonzalez wrote in Shoreline v. McLemore.]

Maybe I’m reading this incorrectly but seems like a bit of common sense according to the Bill of Rights.

Am I wrong?


8 posted on 04/19/2019 4:04:55 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SaveFerris

No … there are a lot of things that happen that are clear violations of common sense readings of the Bill of Rights.


9 posted on 04/19/2019 4:08:19 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson