Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/17/2019 6:10:03 PM PDT by Track9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Track9
Good article!

Thanks for posting!


2 posted on 04/17/2019 6:26:51 PM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Fedora

PING


3 posted on 04/17/2019 9:13:39 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Track9
But Nixon’s second term was not going to be a continuation of the first. Even The New York Times noted that the transformation of government demanded by Nixon after his 1972 re-election—his stated intention was to rein in the executive bureaucracy—was as extreme as if an opposition party had won.

Of course they did. They always say that about Republicans. Whether it's true or not is hard to say. Nixon was definitely a political warrior, whether he was really going to be tough on budgets and deficits is another matter.

5 posted on 04/17/2019 9:55:50 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson